2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted geometric mean model for determining thermal conductivity of reservoir rocks: Current problems with applicability and the model modification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 40 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the lower temperature at the top of the steam chamber, wet steam is predominant; as the density of nitrogen is lower than that of wet steam, nitrogen is more likely to distribute in the upper part of the steam chamber. The thermal conductivity of nitrogen is lower than that of oil, water, and rock (nitrogen: 0.02 W/m•K; oil: 0.13 W/m•K; water: 0.6 W/m•K; rock: 2.75 W/m•K) [20,21]. Nitrogen accumulated at the top of the reservoir forms a thermal insulation layer, reducing the upward heat transfer rate to the overburden, minimizing heat loss, improving thermal efficiency, and consequently reducing the steam injection volume and increasing the cumulative oil-to-steam ratio.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Due to the lower temperature at the top of the steam chamber, wet steam is predominant; as the density of nitrogen is lower than that of wet steam, nitrogen is more likely to distribute in the upper part of the steam chamber. The thermal conductivity of nitrogen is lower than that of oil, water, and rock (nitrogen: 0.02 W/m•K; oil: 0.13 W/m•K; water: 0.6 W/m•K; rock: 2.75 W/m•K) [20,21]. Nitrogen accumulated at the top of the reservoir forms a thermal insulation layer, reducing the upward heat transfer rate to the overburden, minimizing heat loss, improving thermal efficiency, and consequently reducing the steam injection volume and increasing the cumulative oil-to-steam ratio.…”
Section: Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%