2014 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops 2014
DOI: 10.1109/icstw.2014.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted Execution Profiles for Software Testing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heuristic conjectures that a program element that is not covered by many tests should be considered more relevant to failure and assigned a higher score, because in typical test suites, the number of failing test cases is much smaller than the number of passing test cases . Given a test suite T and a program element pe i , the score assigned to pe i is Score(pe i)=1count()pei|T|, where count ( pe i ) is the number of tests covering pe i ; and if pe i never occurred in any of the test cases, then Score ( pe i ) is 0.…”
Section: Reduction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The heuristic conjectures that a program element that is not covered by many tests should be considered more relevant to failure and assigned a higher score, because in typical test suites, the number of failing test cases is much smaller than the number of passing test cases . Given a test suite T and a program element pe i , the score assigned to pe i is Score(pe i)=1count()pei|T|, where count ( pe i ) is the number of tests covering pe i ; and if pe i never occurred in any of the test cases, then Score ( pe i ) is 0.…”
Section: Reduction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%