2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.08.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted bilinear Hardy inequalities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…with constant c independent of f and g, where T i = H or H * , i = 1, 2, are equivalent to inequalities (1.5)-(1.6) and (1.7)-(1.8) (see, for instance, [1]). It is well-known that when T is a integral operator then by substitution of variables it is possible to change the cone of non-decreasing functions to the cone of non-increasing functions and vice versa, when considering inequalities…”
Section: Hg(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with constant c independent of f and g, where T i = H or H * , i = 1, 2, are equivalent to inequalities (1.5)-(1.6) and (1.7)-(1.8) (see, for instance, [1]). It is well-known that when T is a integral operator then by substitution of variables it is possible to change the cone of non-decreasing functions to the cone of non-increasing functions and vice versa, when considering inequalities…”
Section: Hg(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper [1] motivated the work presented here. Indeed, here we consider a restricted version of (4) which may be called the bilinear Hardy inequality for nonincreasing functions and written in the form…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The covered range of exponents in there was 1 < p, q < ∞. For some related results see also the references in [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations