2011
DOI: 10.2337/dc10-1119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-Related Quality of Life, Health Utility, Psychological Well-Being, and Satisfaction With Exenatide Once Weekly Compared With Sitagliptin or Pioglitazone After 26 Weeks of Treatment

Abstract: OBJECTIVETo assess change in patient-reported outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide once weekly compared with those treated with sitagliptin or pioglitazone.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODSIn this 26-week randomized, multicenter, double-dummy study, 491 subjects received 2 mg of exenatide once weekly or maximum daily doses of sitagliptin (100 mg) or pioglitazone (45 mg) on a background of metformin. Weight-related quality of life, health utility, psychological well-being, and diabetes tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…67 In the DURATION-2 study (described above), weightrelated QOL, psychological general wellbeing, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and general health status were assessed using the IWQOL-Lite, Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) index, DTSQ, and EQ-5D at baseline and week 26. 77 The exenatide once-weekly group experienced significant improvement in physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, work, and IWQOL total score compared with pioglitazone; however, there were no significant differences between exenatide once weekly and sitagliptin. Overall treatment satisfaction improved significantly in the exenatide once-weekly group versus sitagliptin.…”
Section: Patient Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…67 In the DURATION-2 study (described above), weightrelated QOL, psychological general wellbeing, diabetes treatment satisfaction, and general health status were assessed using the IWQOL-Lite, Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) index, DTSQ, and EQ-5D at baseline and week 26. 77 The exenatide once-weekly group experienced significant improvement in physical function, self-esteem, sexual life, public distress, work, and IWQOL total score compared with pioglitazone; however, there were no significant differences between exenatide once weekly and sitagliptin. Overall treatment satisfaction improved significantly in the exenatide once-weekly group versus sitagliptin.…”
Section: Patient Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…However, exenatide ER recipients showed significantly greater improvements in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite scores than pioglitazone (p B 0.05) [17,43] or insulin detemir (p = 0.015) [27] and significantly (p B 0.05) greater improvements than pioglitazone in the EuroQol-5D index score [17]. Exenatide ER and liraglutide improved treatment satisfaction and depression to a similar extent [25].…”
Section: Treatment Satisfaction/health-related Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 97%
“…As reviewed earlier [11], treatment satisfaction and/or health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) improved from baseline to a similar extent in patients receiving exenatide ER, exenatide twice daily, sitagliptin or insulin glargine [17,18,26,42,43]. However, exenatide ER recipients showed significantly greater improvements in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite scores than pioglitazone (p B 0.05) [17,43] or insulin detemir (p = 0.015) [27] and significantly (p B 0.05) greater improvements than pioglitazone in the EuroQol-5D index score [17].…”
Section: Treatment Satisfaction/health-related Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have compared prolonged-release exenatide with metformin, ▼sitagliptin and pioglitazone both as monotherapy and in combination 10,11,15…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Treatment differences were statistically significant for exenatide vs. sitagliptin (–0.6 percentage points, 95% CI –0.9 to –0.4, p<0.0001) and vs. pioglitazone (–0.3 percentage points, 95% CI –0.6 to –0.1, p=0.0165) 10. Patient-related outcomes (secondary outcome) were reported separately 15. IWQOL-Lite total scores and health utility (EQ-5D) scores increased significantly in exenatide- and sitagliptin-treated patients (p<0.05).…”
Section: Clinical Efficacymentioning
confidence: 99%