Weight loss in head and neck cancer patients little noticed in general practice

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In head and neck cancer patients, weight loss increases morbidity and mortality, and decreases treatment tolerance and quality of life. Early nutritional intervention has beneficial effects on these factors. AIM: We observed patients’ weight courses after specialists’ care and surveyed nutrition-related documentation by general practitioners (GPs). METHODS: From a Head and Neck Oncology Centre (HNOC) study, 68 patients were asked to participate in an extended general practice cohort. Twenty-six patients participated in the prospective three-monthly weight measurements during the year after HNOC care. We extracted nutritional information contained in referral letters (n=24) and medical records from the year before referral (n=45) and after HNOC care (n=26). An impaired nutritional status was assigned to weight loss =10% within six months or Body Mass Index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m2 and ‘at risk’ to weight loss =5% but <10% within six months. RESULTS: Three (12%) participants were nutritionally impaired and two (8%) were deemed ‘at risk’. Although GPs suspected a (pre-) malignancy in 11 cases (46%), only two (8%) documented weight loss or BMI and four (17%) nutrition-related complaints in their referral letters. Medical records more often contained information on nutrition-related complaints and tube feeding later in the disease course, as opposed to concern over weight loss or BMI. DISCUSSION: Therefore, we call for nutritional management in general practice, by urging practitioners to assess patients’ nutritional status throughout the disease course and intervene if necessary. The passing on of related information in case of referral promotes continuity of care. KEYWORDS: Humans; follow-up studies; weight loss; cachexia; family practice; head and neck neoplasms

Cancer cachexia update in head and neck cancer: Definitions and diagnostic features

“…Patients with head and neck cancer require multidisciplinary management, including proper assessment of nutritional status, attention to dietary requirements, counseling, and compliance maintenance . Assessing the patients' nutritional status periodically throughout the disease becomes crucial …”

Early death among head and neck cancer patients

“…Furthermore, aspiration was present in 48% of 101 HNC patients analyzed for sequelae, and patients with aspiration had a significantly higher mean weight loss and a lower BMI (11 and 23%, respectively) at follow-up compared with patients without aspiration (3 and 26%, respectively) [21]. Patients with HNC are at risk for malnutrition because of tumor-related causes and treatment sequelae [22]. Severe malnutrition negatively impacted both short-term mortality and overall survival in HNC patients [23].…”

Pretreatment risk stratification of feeding tube use in patients treated with intensity‐modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer

“…[1][2][3][4] Enteral feeding via a feeding tube is a common method of providing patient nutrition during and immediately after RT in as many as 80% of patients. [1][2][3][4] Enteral feeding via a feeding tube is a common method of providing patient nutrition during and immediately after RT in as many as 80% of patients.…”