2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2012.01973.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-length relationship of 63 demersal fishes on the shallow coast of Paraná, Brazil

Abstract: Summary This work presents the weight–length relationship of 63 species of fish belonging to 24 families. Data were collected monthly along the Paraná state coast (Brazil) from August 2004 to July 2005 on five transects between 6 and 15 m. Several of these species had no previously published weight–length relationships.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, we have to take in account the great number of individuals who could not be sexed due to limitations of macroscopic analysis (Klibansky and Scharf 2015), thus, the information herein should be treated with caution. With respect to the size structure of the studied population, the length range recorded in our study for C. nobilis (2.8 to 35.4 cm) differed from the one reported for Pombo et al (2014) in the south-eastern Brazil (4.9 to 18 cm) and for Passos et al (2012) in the southern Brazil (4.6 to 15.2 cm), with a new maximum total length of 35.4 recorded for the species. Differences in the size structure of C. nobilis between different locations may result from a variety of factors, such as, latitudinal variation, environmental conditions, and food availability (Jeppesen et al 2010, de Queiroz et al 2018, but especially from the applied sampling methods (Le Cren 1947, Beamesderfer andRieman 1988).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nonetheless, we have to take in account the great number of individuals who could not be sexed due to limitations of macroscopic analysis (Klibansky and Scharf 2015), thus, the information herein should be treated with caution. With respect to the size structure of the studied population, the length range recorded in our study for C. nobilis (2.8 to 35.4 cm) differed from the one reported for Pombo et al (2014) in the south-eastern Brazil (4.9 to 18 cm) and for Passos et al (2012) in the southern Brazil (4.6 to 15.2 cm), with a new maximum total length of 35.4 recorded for the species. Differences in the size structure of C. nobilis between different locations may result from a variety of factors, such as, latitudinal variation, environmental conditions, and food availability (Jeppesen et al 2010, de Queiroz et al 2018, but especially from the applied sampling methods (Le Cren 1947, Beamesderfer andRieman 1988).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…Differences in the size structure of C. nobilis between different locations may result from a variety of factors, such as, latitudinal variation, environmental conditions, and food availability (Jeppesen et al 2010, de Queiroz et al 2018, but especially from the applied sampling methods (Le Cren 1947, Beamesderfer andRieman 1988). For instance, in both studies cited earlier (Passos et al 2012, Pombo et al 2014, specimens were sampled using only trawl nets, whereas in our study a variety of fishing gears were used (i.e., beach seine, gillnets, and trawls) for sampling individuals from a broader size range.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For M. furnieri values of b > 3 (grew more in weight than in length) corresponded to individuals collected in shallow and protected coastal areas (coastal lagoons, bays, river mouths) or juveniles stages (Castello 1986, Muto et al 2000, Joyeux et al 2009, Borthagaray et al 2011, Passos et al 2012, Segura et al 2012, Gurdek & Acuña 2014, except the b estimated by Franco et al (2014) (Table 3). Individuals that inhabit shallow coastal waters (Castello 1986, Borthagaray et al 2011) grow differently from those that inhabit greater depths (Haimovici & Umpierre 1996, Norbis & Verocai 2005, and use shallow coastal waters as nursery and feeding grounds (Mandali & Paes 1998Olsson et al 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Parameters a and b were estimated using a simple linear regression model over log‐transformed data. The presence of outliers for each species was verified graphically using log L –log W plots (Passos et al., ) and eliminated prior to calculations. Species were identified following Fisher et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%