2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-003-0334-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-increasing effect of topology simplification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, we get with the adaptive approach a better compliance with less gray elements. An unwanted effect in this specific test case is the formation of ''chain elements'', which was discussed in [8].…”
Section: Adaptive Penalization Schemementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, we get with the adaptive approach a better compliance with less gray elements. An unwanted effect in this specific test case is the formation of ''chain elements'', which was discussed in [8].…”
Section: Adaptive Penalization Schemementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [7] has been shown, that the choice of a fixed penalty factor or the type of the continuation scheme has a strong influence on the resulting design. Moreover it has been shown in [8] that a weightincreasing effect can emerge from additional topology constraints. Furthermore the number of iterations for a given convergence norm may also be affected by different penalizations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, according to Díaz and Sigmund (1995), the checkerboard pattern is directly associated with the finite element method numerical assumptions, which leads to some artificial stiffness. Different approaches lead efficiently with this problem, as the adoption of higherorder finite elements (Díaz and Sigmund, 1995;Sigmund and Petersson, 1998), filtering techniques based on image processing or perimeter control (Sigmund, 2007;Haber et al, 1996) and the employment of modified finite elements (Rozvany et al, 2003;Pomezanski et al, 2005;Poulsen, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, since the landmark paper of Bendsøe and Kikuchi [1], numerical methods for topology optimization of continuum structures have been developed quickly in application [2][3][4]. The classical methods include the homogenization method [5,6], the variable density method (including solid isotropic material with penalization model (SIMP) and rational approximation of material properties (RAMP) interpolation model) [7][8][9][10], evolutionary structural optimization (ESO) [11][12][13], level set method [14][15][16], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%