1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1566-1369(99)80041-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight functions and stress intensity factors for embedded cracks subjected to arbitrary mode I stress fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the weight function approach (Glinka, 1996), maximum stress intensity factors ( K Imax ) were calculated for the crack profiles seen in Figures 13 and 14 along with a few others. The weight function method was preferred since the equations accounted for the thickness of the samples, which on average was about 3.56 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the weight function approach (Glinka, 1996), maximum stress intensity factors ( K Imax ) were calculated for the crack profiles seen in Figures 13 and 14 along with a few others. The weight function method was preferred since the equations accounted for the thickness of the samples, which on average was about 3.56 mm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LEFM model applied by Krug and others (2014) is similar to the van der Veen (1998b) model in that the net Cauchy stress is multiplied by a single weight function and integrated over the depth of the crack to obtain the net SIF. Thus, using the weight function method, net SIF at the tip of a surface crevasse is calculated as and at the tip of a basal crevasse is calculated as where β is the universal weight function provided in Appendix C (Glinka, 1996). The term ‘universal weight function’ is slightly deceiving here because the parameters M i in the expression for β (see Appendix C) change with the geometry and boundary conditions of the cracked body.…”
Section: Lefm Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another simple approximate method was proposed by G‐S . In this method, 3D SIFs at two points are considered.…”
Section: Wfms For 3d Crack Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of geometric condition is inconsistent: m" = 0 was used in the previous study 46 with fixed constant of M 2 = 3, and m' = 0 was used in another study. 107 For the surface point, the FIGURE 13 Ratio of the two multiple reference states (MRS) Green's functions (GFs) for an edge crack in a circular disc, based on the same reference load cases and geometric condition m" = 0, by using Glinka-Shen universal weight function method (UWFM) and Fett-Munz direct adjustment method (DAM) weight function method (WFM), respectively geometric condition in the G-S UWF is replaced by a condition that the WF must vanish at the surface by considering the "boundary layer effect" in which the stress singularity "r −1/2 " vanishes. Another problem with this method is that only SIFs due to stresses varying in one direction (x or y, so called univariant stress) can be considered.…”
Section: Wfms For 3d Crack Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%