1996
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170340078015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-for-Length Reference Data for Preterm, Low-Birth-Weight Infants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This knowledge, in combination with the availability of specialized growth charts to track the growth of VLBW infants (24)(25)(26), led to the decision to exclude data for VLBW (< 1500 gm) infants from the revised infant growth charts.…”
Section: Data Exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This knowledge, in combination with the availability of specialized growth charts to track the growth of VLBW infants (24)(25)(26), led to the decision to exclude data for VLBW (< 1500 gm) infants from the revised infant growth charts.…”
Section: Data Exclusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infants and children were also grouped by gestation-corrected age (GCA). 11,18,19 Gestation-corrected age was calculated as age in months, adjusted for length of gestation, using the following algorithm: for those born at 21 to 24 weeks' gestation, GCA = CA (in months) −4; at 25 to 28 weeks, GCA = CA (in months) −3; at 29 to 32 weeks, GCA = CA (in months) −2; at 33 to 36 weeks, GCA = CA (in months) −1. Using this algorithm, 9 infants were excluded from analyses using the GCA groups because their GCA was 1 month or younger and fell below the age limit for the youngest group, and 1.4% of the sample (64 of 4431) was reclassified into a contiguous younger age group.…”
Section: Age Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…veloped to evaluate infants born both LBW and preterm. 11,19 Unlike SGA infants born at term, preterm LBW infants show limited or no catch-up at least through the first 12 months, although those born AGA and preterm do relatively better. 12,31,32 This is unlike most of the findings on SGA infants, especially those born at term, for whom catch-up can be expected.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations