2010
DOI: 10.1159/000276547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight Bias in the Media: A Review of Recent Research

Abstract: Background: There is ample evidence that overweight and obese individuals are stigmatized in various forms of media. This weight bias is particularly disconcerting when it targets children and adolescents. Objective: The current review surveys the most recent 15 years of research on weight bias and stigmatization in the media and discusses some theoretical models that might help explain the negative effects of such material. Method: PsycINFO searches were conducted using weight bias- and stigmatization-related… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(47 reference statements)
4
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most pervasive sources of weight stigmatization is the mass media (Ata & Thompson, 2010;Puhl & Heuer, 2009). Previous research has documented weight stigmatization toward obese persons in print media (Boero, 2007;Campo & Mastin, 2007;Kim & Willis, 2007;Lawrence, 2004;Malkin, Wornian, & Chrisler, 1999;Sandberg, 2007), and in popular television shows and films that frequently stigmatize obese characters (Greenberg, Eastin, Hofshire, Lachlan, & Brownell, 2003;Herbozo, Tantleff-Dunn, Gokee-Larose, & Thompson, 2004;Himes & Thompson, 2007;Stein, 2007) who are more often ridiculed and negatively stereotyped compared with their average weight or thin counterparts (Fouts & Burggraf, 1999Fouts & Vaughan, 2002;Herbozo et al, 2004;Himes & Thompson, 2007;Klein & Shiffman, 2005Robinson, Callister, & Jankoski, 2008;White, Brown, & Ginsburg, 1999).…”
Section: R M Puhl Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most pervasive sources of weight stigmatization is the mass media (Ata & Thompson, 2010;Puhl & Heuer, 2009). Previous research has documented weight stigmatization toward obese persons in print media (Boero, 2007;Campo & Mastin, 2007;Kim & Willis, 2007;Lawrence, 2004;Malkin, Wornian, & Chrisler, 1999;Sandberg, 2007), and in popular television shows and films that frequently stigmatize obese characters (Greenberg, Eastin, Hofshire, Lachlan, & Brownell, 2003;Herbozo, Tantleff-Dunn, Gokee-Larose, & Thompson, 2004;Himes & Thompson, 2007;Stein, 2007) who are more often ridiculed and negatively stereotyped compared with their average weight or thin counterparts (Fouts & Burggraf, 1999Fouts & Vaughan, 2002;Herbozo et al, 2004;Himes & Thompson, 2007;Klein & Shiffman, 2005Robinson, Callister, & Jankoski, 2008;White, Brown, & Ginsburg, 1999).…”
Section: R M Puhl Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Negative weight-based characterizations in the media have been consistently documented, whereby obese individuals are portrayed as unintelligent and undisciplined architects of their own condition [1]. Furthermore, overweight people are underrepresented in entertainment programs, but those who do appear are portrayed as unattractive, shown engaging in stereotypical eating behavior, and the target of ridicule and derision [8,10,19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fashion show, models have little agency: control over their appearance and presentation-from what they wear to how they move their bodies-is decided by designers, stylists and producers rather than the models themselves (MEARS, 2011). Furthermore, the media's representation of non-hegemonic people removes their personhood by depicting them through narrow stereotypes associated with their particular group (ATA & THOMPSON, 2010;GARLAND THOMSON, 1997). [24] Academic research might seem far removed from the dehumanizing practices of the fashion media and the fashion industry, but it, too, has also been critiqued for the objectification of researchers and participants.…”
Section: Representation Of Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%