2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-based multiple empirical kernel learning with neighbor discriminant constraint for heart failure mortality prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, nine representative classifiers are selected to compare with the proposed SSMEKL. The comparison algorithms are MK-MHKS, 39 SMKSVM, 26 SVM, 40 GLMKL, 41 TSVM, 42 EasyMKL, 43 XGBoost, 44 WMEKL-NDC, 45 and RGC. 46 MK-MHKS is a classic and efficient multiple kernel learning algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, nine representative classifiers are selected to compare with the proposed SSMEKL. The comparison algorithms are MK-MHKS, 39 SMKSVM, 26 SVM, 40 GLMKL, 41 TSVM, 42 EasyMKL, 43 XGBoost, 44 WMEKL-NDC, 45 and RGC. 46 MK-MHKS is a classic and efficient multiple kernel learning algorithm.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the wider application of various supervised learning methods such as SVM [9], [10], deep learning [11], RF, decision tree (DT) [12], MLP [13], and LR [14] for HF prediction, the effectiveness of these HF prediction methods have scope for improvement and requires much research effort. The literature review shows that most of the supervised methods are developed on the original dataset and the significance of pre-processing such as feature scaling, and dimensionality reduction for the linear model such as SVM is widely ignored [15]- [20]. To address the research gap, this study investigates feature scaling, and PCA as a method for improving the performance of DT, RF, and SVM models for HF prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the high dimensionality, sparsity, and heterogeneity of EMR data [ 12 , 18 ] pose many obstacles for directly inputting the raw data into machine learning–based predictive models. Some manual and data-driven feature engineering methods [ 15 , 19 ], though time-consuming and laborious, were used to select important features or extract useful information for predictive tasks. Moreover, the performance of predictive models relies heavily on the representation of data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMR data can be used to not only reflect the health status of patients and record the treatment trajectory, but also help doctors in making clinical decisions [1][2][3][4][5][6] and improving the efficiency of diagnosis and treatment [1,7,8]. One of the most prevalent and practical tasks of the secondary use of EMR data is building models to predict the disease status [8][9][10] and treatment outcomes [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] for a patient, using machine learning algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%