2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weight-adjusted versus fixed dose heparin thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The American College of Chest Physicians guidelines recommend weight-based rather than fixed dosing in this patient population, 13 although a 2021 meta-analysis did not find a difference in efficacy and safety based on dosing approach for unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. 14 There is also indirect evidence from orthopaedic surgery patients that the use of aspirin may be appropriate for VTE prophylaxis in nonorthopaedic surgery patients. 13 The need for chemoprophylaxis should be balanced with the risk of postoperative bleeding after TSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The American College of Chest Physicians guidelines recommend weight-based rather than fixed dosing in this patient population, 13 although a 2021 meta-analysis did not find a difference in efficacy and safety based on dosing approach for unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin. 14 There is also indirect evidence from orthopaedic surgery patients that the use of aspirin may be appropriate for VTE prophylaxis in nonorthopaedic surgery patients. 13 The need for chemoprophylaxis should be balanced with the risk of postoperative bleeding after TSS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients assigned to rivaroxaban, 10 mg was administered orally once daily. For patients assigned to nadroparin, a weight‐based dosing, rather than fixed dosing, was employed in our center, since weight‐based prophylactic dosing is preferable for patients with extreme body weight 29–32 . Under the guidance of the nadroparin drug specifications, 38 units/kg was subcutaneously administered once daily for 3 days postoperatively, and increased to 57 units/kg once daily from fourth postoperative day until discharge.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For patients assigned to nadroparin, a weight-based dosing, rather than fixed dosing, was employed in our center, since weight-based prophylactic dosing is preferable for patients with extreme body weight. [29][30][31][32] Under the guidance of the nadroparin drug specifications, 38 units/kg was subcutaneously administered once daily for 3 days postoperatively, and increased to 57 units/kg once daily from fourth postoperative day until discharge. The administration of the study drugs started 12-24 h after surgery and continued once daily every 24 h within a window of ±2 h until discharge from the hospital.…”
Section: Random Assignment and Study Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have shown that weight-adjusted doses as compared to fixed-doses of heparins in the prevention of VTE in obese patients was not associated with a lower risk of VTE nor a higher risk of bleeding. 41 Others found that bleeding complications were significantly higher for patients in the high-dose group. 42,43 Among the 3928 obese inpatients (weight >100 kg and BMI !40 kg m À2 ), Wang showed that high-dose thromboprophylaxis approximately halved the odds of symptomatic VTE.…”
Section: Adjusted Dosementioning
confidence: 98%