2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00159-021-00132-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighing stars from birth to death: mass determination methods across the HRD

Abstract: The mass of a star is the most fundamental parameter for its structure, evolution, and final fate. It is particularly important for any kind of stellar archaeology and characterization of exoplanets. There exist a variety of methods in astronomy to estimate or determine it. In this review we present a significant number of such methods, beginning with the most direct and model-independent approach using detached eclipsing binaries. We then move to more indirect and model-dependent methods, such as the quite co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 643 publications
(655 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measuring the IMF of a stellar population is difficult and is dependent on the mass estimates of individual stars, which have varying accuracy (e.g. Serenelli et al 2021). However it appears that the stellar IMF, to a good approximation, is well represented by a power law distribution in the range 1-100 M⊙ with massive stars rarer than their low mass counterparts, and with little evidence for variation over the history of the Universe.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Stellar Evolution Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the IMF of a stellar population is difficult and is dependent on the mass estimates of individual stars, which have varying accuracy (e.g. Serenelli et al 2021). However it appears that the stellar IMF, to a good approximation, is well represented by a power law distribution in the range 1-100 M⊙ with massive stars rarer than their low mass counterparts, and with little evidence for variation over the history of the Universe.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Stellar Evolution Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, proximity effects (reflection effect, ellipsoidal effect, gravity darkening) are more complex to model and can make it impossible to determine radii to 0.1% precision (e.g., [265]). A benchmark EB must also have high-quality T eff measurements (a recent approach by Miller et al [346] is promising) and spectroscopic chemical abundances [347].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mass of a star is its fundamental defining property, but direct measurements remain elusive with the exception of visual binaries or eclipsing spectroscopic binaries (Andersen 1991;Serenelli et al 2021). Consequently mass estimates usually follow from spectroscopic results or comparison with evolutionary predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%