2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-014-2610-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weibull Analysis of Mechanical Data for Castings II: Weibull Mixtures and Their Interpretation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for B201, fatigue life and quality index data was found to have Weibull mixtures, as indicated in Table 2. In such cases, the cumulative probability is expressed as [26];…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that for B201, fatigue life and quality index data was found to have Weibull mixtures, as indicated in Table 2. In such cases, the cumulative probability is expressed as [26];…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that for both Q T and N f , there are inflection points in the probability plots which are indicative of Weibull mixtures [25][26][27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with the observations stated previously about Figure 2, it was noticed that in the BM region there were two Fe-containing particle size distributions: coarse particles in bands, and finer particles within the matrix. The probability density function (f) for the mixture of two distributions is written as [21]:…”
Section: Characterization Of the Effect Of Fsp On Microstructurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[15][16][17] The goodness-of-fit of linear regression line (i.e., R 2 ) was accordingly used to determine the Weibull behavior of the datasets. [18,19] Tiryakioglu [19] developed the following equation for the critical R 2 value to determine the Weibull behavior of a dataset:…”
Section: The Weibull Distribution Has Been Widely Used Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2,[9][10][11][12][13] Previous researchers suggested that this deviation could be due to the nature of the physical flaws (i.e., defects, such as porosity, low melting point intermetallic compounds, and segregation) in the material, [14,30] and the corresponding data points were interpreted to follow an underlying 3-p or mixed Weibull distribution. [15][16][17] However, more analysis (Eq. [25]) is still required to distinguish what is the actual reason of the deviation.…”
Section: A Determination Of Weibull Behavior Of Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%