2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0165115320000182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weeping Qingdao Tears Abroad: Locating Chinese Publics in Colonial Malaya, circa 1919

Abstract: This article suggests that conditions of coloniality produce a sui generis public sphere, one which contains multiple, plurilingual collective audiences, rather than a single “bourgeois public sphere” (Habermas), or a single “imagined community” (Anderson). By way of illustration, it locates diasporic Chinese publics in the colonial public sphere of British Malaya, and argues for a more analytically differentiated understanding of their constituent collectivities, or what it refers to as “we” publics. It analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Rachel Leow shows in her examples from British-controlled Malaya, while the state asserted a "monopoly of public articulation" through the installation of "speaking officials" as expert commentators on news and public affairs, local newspapers published the state-sanctioned statements side by side with their own correspondents' material, reducing the hierarchy to a set of dialogues and critiques. 30 In form as much as content, therefore, newspapers could flatten official discourse into a relationship of equivalence simply by juxtaposing contributions on the printed page.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Rachel Leow shows in her examples from British-controlled Malaya, while the state asserted a "monopoly of public articulation" through the installation of "speaking officials" as expert commentators on news and public affairs, local newspapers published the state-sanctioned statements side by side with their own correspondents' material, reducing the hierarchy to a set of dialogues and critiques. 30 In form as much as content, therefore, newspapers could flatten official discourse into a relationship of equivalence simply by juxtaposing contributions on the printed page.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%