2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.117303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weekly patterns and weekend effects of air pollution in the Moscow megacity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is necessary to highlight that important differences between sites were registered in the Cantabrian network, with positive relative changes in O 3 concentrations at Tetuán (Santander urban background) and Cros (industrial) sites, indicating the importance of local sources of different precursors on O 3 formation. In this line, Querol et al [ 70 ] described different responses of urban O 3 but a generalized and light decrease in rural locations. Therefore, this needs to be further investigated, bearing in mind the complex behaviour of O 3 during the lockdown, which can be partially explained by the alteration of the photolytic cycle due to a strong decrease in NO levels in a VOCs-limited environment (usually urban areas) [ 82 ], which acts on the consumption of O 3 in the titration reaction (NO + O 3 ↔ NO 2 + O 2 ) [ 49 , 83 ] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, it is necessary to highlight that important differences between sites were registered in the Cantabrian network, with positive relative changes in O 3 concentrations at Tetuán (Santander urban background) and Cros (industrial) sites, indicating the importance of local sources of different precursors on O 3 formation. In this line, Querol et al [ 70 ] described different responses of urban O 3 but a generalized and light decrease in rural locations. Therefore, this needs to be further investigated, bearing in mind the complex behaviour of O 3 during the lockdown, which can be partially explained by the alteration of the photolytic cycle due to a strong decrease in NO levels in a VOCs-limited environment (usually urban areas) [ 82 ], which acts on the consumption of O 3 in the titration reaction (NO + O 3 ↔ NO 2 + O 2 ) [ 49 , 83 ] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to highlight that, because the study made a daily comparison, i.e., each day of the year 2020 was compared with the same day of the average (2013–2019), the variable “week” was not normalised, as this variable represented the seasonal changes attributed to each week of the year, which were observed in both data series. By contrast, the day of the week was normalised, because weekly patterns of pollutant concentrations are important, mainly due to differences between working days and weekends [ 70 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is mainly due to changes in behavior from working on weekdays to resting on weekends. In the megacities of US, Europe, Japan, and Russia, air pollution weekend effects were identified by ground measurements and remote sensing, usually showing reductions of up to 50% or more during the weekends compared with weekdays ( Beirle et al, 2003 ; de Foy et al, 2016a ; de Foy and Schauer, 2019 ; Elansky et al, 2020 ; Marr and Harley, 2002 ; Motallebi et al, 2003 ). For the weekly cycle of Beijing, China, ozone (O 3 ) has been reported to have a clear weekly periodical variation with a maximum on weekends ( Wang et al, 2013 ; Zhao et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Health Risk Assessment in a Tourist City Rungruang JANTA and Jenjira KAEWRAT http://wjst.wu.ac.th high traffic density occurred on local streets resulting in delays or traffic congestion [29][30][31]. The level of air pollutants in tourist destinations differs from megacities such as Moscow, Tokyo and Osaka, where NO 2 is largely emitted on weekdays rather than at weekends because of the operation of industrial enterprises and traffic intensity [32,33]. The NO 2 concentration in each area related to the travel behavior of tourists and the system of transportation.…”
Section: Figure 2 Comparison Of Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration Betweementioning
confidence: 99%