2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weekly cabazitaxel plus prednisone is effective and less toxic for ‘unfit’ metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Phase II Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group (SOGUG) trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Climent et al have assessed baseline CTC numbers in 56 patients receiving cabazitaxel therapy. They also found an association between CTC count and PFS, however they did not find a statistically significant association between CTC count and OS [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Climent et al have assessed baseline CTC numbers in 56 patients receiving cabazitaxel therapy. They also found an association between CTC count and PFS, however they did not find a statistically significant association between CTC count and OS [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prostate cancer, the enumeration of CTCs is a strong independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) both before and during therapy, as shown in multiple studies [8,9,10,11]. However, the prognostic value for patients treated with cabazitaxel has only been analyzed in a small series of 56 patients [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, several studies support the utility and safety of Cab as either a second-or third-line agent after Doc; i.e. : (a) The re-challenge with Cab chemotherapy was shown as working in CRPCa patients treated with > 10 cycles of Doc, with an acceptable risk of adverse effects burden [10][11][12]; (b) Cab at a higher initial dose demonstrated longer survival duration after treatment than a lower initial dose for Doc-resistant mCRPCa patients [13]; (c) Cab/prednisone administered weekly to unfit mCRPCa patients appeared to be as effective as classical standard 3-week scheme (TROPIC study) but with significantly lower toxicities and better tolerance [14]; and (d) the combination of Cab and abiraterone was found to have a manageable safety profile and showed antitumor activity in patients previously treated with Doc and abiraterone [15]. Furthermore, the promising therapeutic findings on Cab benefits (as mono-or combined therapies) in other types of cancers such as cisplatin-resistant germ cell tumor cells [16], breast cancer [17,18], sorafenib-resistant hepatocellular carcinomas [19], mCRPCa [20,21], cytarabine-resistant leukemia [22], glioblastoma [23] or gliomas [24] impel for more studies to understand Cab modes of action.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Prior use of abiraterone does not seem to impact the response to cabazitaxel [66] . A phase II trial reported a 34.9% PSA response rate in a 10 mg/m 2 weekly treatment schedule and reported a lower toxicity, 14.2% neutropenia and 35.7% diarrhea [67] .…”
Section: Current Treatment Patterns For Crpcmentioning
confidence: 99%