Weeds, aphids, and specialist parasitoids and predators benefit differently from organic and conventional cropping of winter cereals

Abstract

The aphid-natural enemy interaction in winter wheat fields constitutes a complex system that has been frequently studied because of its implication for biological control. However, not all of the aphids living in cereal fields are crop pests, as there are also aphids living on weeds that may serve as alternative hosts or prey for aphid parasitoids or predators. In this context, a concomitant survey of the plant and insect communities was conducted to understand how different plant communities affect the abundance and richness of aphids and the interactions with their natural enemies. The plant community was split into functional groups (grasses, legumes and forbs), and the aphid community was divided into feeding groups according to their host preferences (specialists in grasses or forbs). The grass aphids, which dominated the total aphid catches, responded positively to grass cover, which was particularly enhanced in the conventional fields. Conversely, the forb aphids, which mainly conditioned the total species richness of the aphids, were closely correlated with the local abundance of legumes. The system of cereal aphid-parasitoids was enhanced in the conventional fields, where the abundance of grasses was higher, whereas the legumes of the organic fields indirectly played a key role in enhancing the richness of the parasitoids and the abundance of predators. Our findings indicate that a bottom-up effect exists throughout the plant community, aphids, and aphidophagous insects and that plant community characteristics should be considered to better understand cereal aphid control.Keywords Cereal aphids Á Plant-insect interaction Á Farming system Á Weed community Á Winter wheat Communicated by M. Traugott. Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (

Introducing the term 'Biocontrol Plants' for integrated pest management

“…Many studies which analyze the employment of plants to sustain a reproducing population of natural enemies within a crop that provides long-term pest suppression have an entomological perspective (e.g. Berlinger et al, 1996;Bottrell et al, 1998;Caballero-Lopez et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2011;Lundgren et al, 2009;Wäckers et al, 2005).…”

Hairy Fleabane as a Source of Major Insect Pests of Soybean

“…They may also act as hosts to pests and natural enemies, giving shelter or serving as a food source (Norris, 2005;Caballero-López et al, 2012;Foerster et al, 2015).…”

Integrated Pest Management of Aphis spiraecola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in clementines: enhancing its biological control

“…The importance of these wild plants is reflected by our data showing that they represented approximately 40% of a sown ground cover surface of citrus orchards. Hitherto, with few exceptions (Altieri et al, 1977;, studies of sown ground covers have overlooked the presence of wild plants (Haley and Hogue, 1990;Liang and Huang, 1994; or they have been conducted in experimental plots without these plants (Maredia et al, 1992;Brown and Schmitt, 1996;Smith et al, 1996;Rieux et al, 1999;Caballero-Lopez et al, 2012;Marko et al, 2013). In our study, we have evaluated the effect of a sown ground cover based on Poaceae plants on the biological control of A. spiraecola in citrus orchards.…”