Pot and field studies were conducted to determine the effect of the duration of Rottboellia cochinchinensis [Lour.] W. D. Clayton presence or absence on the growth, development and yield of Z. mays L., and to establish the length of the critical period of weed interference. The crop was maintained weed-free or weedinfested throughout the growth season or for periods of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 weeks after emergence (w.a.e.), respectively. The crop and weed densities used were 55 000 plants/ha, and 55 plants/m 2 , respectively. Regression models were fitted to the growth data and comparison of the relevant regression lines made. The results indicated that the presence or absence of the weed for the varying periods had no effect on the crop plant height, leaf area ratio (LAR), relative growth rate (RGR), net assimilation rate (NAR), and crop growth rate (CGR), but there was consistent trend of reduced LAI and shoot dry weight in the weed-infested treatments. Increasing the periods of weed-free treatments increased yields exponentially, while increasing the periods of the weed infestation decreased yields exponentially. The study demonstrated a critical period of R. cochinchinensis interference on Z. mays growth and development, and yield from 0 to 63 d.a.e., and suggests that the reduction in crop yield may be through non-competitive interference by the weed on the crop. Madrid etal. (1972), considered the 42 days after planting as the critical period of competition for a 120-day maturity period maize where R. cochinchinensis was the predominent weed at high densities in the Philippines. Sharma and Zelaya (1986), in Honduras, found the critical period of competition to be between 30 and 45 days after emergence, and recommended that plots should be kept weed-free during this period to avoid significant yield reductions.Detailed studies on the factors causing reduced maize yield due to the weed interference are lacking, and it is unclear whether the critical period indicates a stage when weeds are most actively interfering with crop growth (Burnside and Wicks, 1967), or rather simply a stage at which weed removal will prevent subsequent loss in yield (McWhorter and Anderson, 1979).The objectives of this research were to determine the effects of different periods of R. cochinchinensis presence and absence on the growth, development and yield of maize, and to establish whether there is a critical period of interference by R. cochinchinensis, and if so, its duration.