1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-1987(94)00429-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weed flora in the early growth period of spring crops under conventional, reduced, and zero tillage systems on a clay soil in northern Alberta, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
26
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…).The possible reason for the increase in weed fresh weight is that weeds compete for light, water and nutrients with plants and thus shallow tillage significantly increased water and thus nutrients availability. Our resultsare similar with the finding of Zorita, (2000) and Gill and Arshad, (1995) who counted lower weed fresh weight in CT and DT compared to RT. Soil covered up the weed seed in CT & DT while not do same in RT so that is why maximum weed fresh weight was counted because of the reduce leaching and high water holding capacity and less disturbance of weeds seed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…).The possible reason for the increase in weed fresh weight is that weeds compete for light, water and nutrients with plants and thus shallow tillage significantly increased water and thus nutrients availability. Our resultsare similar with the finding of Zorita, (2000) and Gill and Arshad, (1995) who counted lower weed fresh weight in CT and DT compared to RT. Soil covered up the weed seed in CT & DT while not do same in RT so that is why maximum weed fresh weight was counted because of the reduce leaching and high water holding capacity and less disturbance of weeds seed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…soil covered up the weed seed in CT & DT while not do same in RT so that is why maximum weed density was counted because of the reduce leaching and high water holding capacity and less disturbance of weeds seed (Cardinaet al, 1991) and/or eradication of weeds. (Gill and Arshad, 1995) counted minimum weeds in mould board and chisel plough compared to rotavator. ).The possible reason for the increase in weed fresh weight is that weeds compete for light, water and nutrients with plants and thus shallow tillage significantly increased water and thus nutrients availability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of reinfestation found after both application timings can be considered as quite low and seems to be a consequence of the absence of soil disturbance. These results are in accordance with the findings of other authors (Gill and Arshad, 1995;Hakansson, 1995;Jensen, 1995). …”
Section: Weed Controlsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…According to Wrucke and Arnold (1985), annual grass weed populations usually increase in notill systems, while annual broad-leaved weeds decrease (Buhler and Daniel, 1988). Gill and Arshad (1995), Hakansson (1995) and Jensen (1995) have reported a reduced late emergence of annual weeds with decreasing soil tillage intensity. In no-till systems, where the soil remains undisturbed and the soil surface is covered by plant residues, weed densities are reduced when compared with other tillage systems (Zanin et al, 1997;Streit et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other perennial species that reproduce vegetatively from buds on underground roots or rhizomes can survive tillage operations and are problems for conventional, reduced, and no-till systems. Gill and Arshad (1995) reported that RT systems often favor annual grasses and discourage annual dicotyledonous species. Gruber et al (2012) found that perennial weeds, which often are typical species in RT systems, were present at lower density in non-inversion tillage systems than in inversion tillage systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%