1990
DOI: 10.1017/s0890037x00025926
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weed Control by Subterranean Clover (Trifolium subterraneum) Used as a Living Mulch

Abstract: Subterranean clover as a living mulch was evaluated for weed control and its effect on field corn silage and grain yield in 1986 to 1988. Treatments included combinations of subterranean clover living mulch, rye dead mulch, and no mulch with three superimposed tillage practices (conventional, minimum, and no-tillage). Results indicated that subterranean clover living mulch effectively controlled ivyleaf morningglory. Little control of fall panicum was obtained in 1986; however, living mulch combinations effect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1
3

Year Published

1992
1992
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
46
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although many legumes have been evaluated as cover crops for different main crops, the establishment cover cropmain crop system has not been successful. Enache and Ilnicki (1990) found that corn silage and grain yields under NT with living mulch [living mulch is a cover crop that remains alive for part or all of the cropping season. Species are typically perennial but may be self-seeding annuals (Teasdale, 1996)] treatments were comparable to or higher than those obtained under the conventional tillage without mulch treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many legumes have been evaluated as cover crops for different main crops, the establishment cover cropmain crop system has not been successful. Enache and Ilnicki (1990) found that corn silage and grain yields under NT with living mulch [living mulch is a cover crop that remains alive for part or all of the cropping season. Species are typically perennial but may be self-seeding annuals (Teasdale, 1996)] treatments were comparable to or higher than those obtained under the conventional tillage without mulch treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intercropped weed suppressor also provides other benefits, such as forage, food, or nitrogen fixation, and examples show that such systems can be economically superior to sole crop systems (e.g., chickpea and wheat intercrop in India (Banik et al 2006), and can provide equivalent yields to conventional monoculture with herbicide (e.g., Enache and Ilnicki 1990). Weed suppression was more variable when intercrops were composed of two or more main crops, rather than composed of a main crop and a smother crop.…”
Section: Weed Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if these were used after desiccation with glyphosate, only wheat and crimson clover were inhibitory. Likewise, subterranean clover cover crops, when used as living mulch under field conditions, can efficiently control weeds such as fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorusm Michx) and ivyleaf morning glory without affecting the yield of corn (Enache and Ilnicki 1990;Ilnicki and Enache 1992).…”
Section: Living Mulch Vs Cover Crop Residuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A living mulch absorbs red light and will reduce the red/far-red ratio sufficiently to inhibit phytochrome-mediated seed germination, whereas cover crop residue has a minimal effect on this ratio (Teasdale and Daughtry 1993). Enache and Ilnicki (1990) reported that weed biomass was reduced 53 to 94 percent by subterranean clover living mulch whereas weed biomass in desiccated rye mulch ranged from an 11 percent decrease to a 76 percent increase compared to a no-mulch control. In another study, a live hairy vetch cover crop was more effective than a desiccated cover crop in suppressing weed emergence during the first four weeks and throughout the season (Teasdale et al 1991).…”
Section: Living Mulch Vs Cover Crop Residuementioning
confidence: 99%