1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5223(97)70226-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wedge resection versus lobectomy for stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer

Abstract: Wedge resection, done by open thoracotomy or video-assisted techniques, appears to be a viable "compromise" surgical treatment of stage I (T1 N0 M0) non-small-cell lung cancer for patients with cardiopulmonary physiologic impairment. Because of the increased risk for local recurrence, anatomic lobectomy remains the surgical treatment of choice for patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer who have adequate physiologic reserve.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
155
1
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 354 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
6
155
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies reported an association between sublobar resection and locoregional recurrence, [43][44][45][46] which suggests worse lung cancer-specific mortality. Lower pulmonary function test and higher comorbidity status seen in the sublobar resection group indicate selection bias on the basis of cardiorespiratory condition and explains the worse noncancerspecific outcomes (Data Supplement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies reported an association between sublobar resection and locoregional recurrence, [43][44][45][46] which suggests worse lung cancer-specific mortality. Lower pulmonary function test and higher comorbidity status seen in the sublobar resection group indicate selection bias on the basis of cardiorespiratory condition and explains the worse noncancerspecific outcomes (Data Supplement).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sublobar resection is another surgical option, whose features include a low complication rate, short hospitalization duration, and a high preservation of lung function (23,24). In recent studies, sublobar resection has shown equivalent oncological results and survival outcome compared with lobectomy (25)(26)(27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the 1997 study of the efficacy of thoracoscopic surgery for stage I NSCLC, Landreneau et al [9] reported a 5-YSR of 58%, 65%, and 70% for patients who received open wedge resection, video-assisted wedge resection, and lobectomy, respectively. Although the calculated survival rate was not statistically significant between the open and video-assisted wedge resection groups, there was a difference in the 5-YSR between the wedge resection and lobectomy groups due to a significantly greater non-cancer-related deaths that occurred within 5 years among the wedge resection group (38% vs. 18%, P = 0.014).…”
Section: [6]mentioning
confidence: 99%