WebTag: Web Browsing into Sensor Tags over NFC

Echevarria, Juan José; Ruiz-de-Garibay, Jonathan; Legarda, Jon; Álvarez, M.; Ayerbe, Ana; Vázquez, Juan Ignacio

doi:10.3390/s120708675

Cited by 14 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Near field communication (NFC) is a specialized subset within the family of RFID technology that uses a high frequency (HF), operating at a frequency of 13.56 MHz [8,9]. NFC devices must be in close proximity to each other, usually not more than a few centimetres (<0.1 m), and have data rates up to 424 kbps, whereas RFID has the ability to broadcast with a read range up to 20 m with a data rate of up to 640 kbps for the chipped one, as clarified in [7,10]. A brief comparison between NFC and chipless RFID is explained in Table 1.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency-Coded Chipless RFID Tags: Notch Model, Detection, Angular Orientation, and Coverage Measurements

Alam

Khaliel

Fawky

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper focuses on the frequency coded chipless Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) wherein the tag’s information bits are physically encoded by the resonators’ notch position which has an effect on the frequency spectrum of the backscattered or retransmitted signal of the tag. In this regard, the notch analytical model is developed to consider the notch position and quality factor. Besides, the radar cross section (RCS) mathematical representation of the tag is introduced to consider the incident wave’s polarization and orientation angles. Hence, the influences of the incident wave’s orientation and polarization mismatches on the detection performance are quantified. After that, the tag measurement errors and limitations are comprehensively explained. Therefore, approaches to measureing RCS- and retransmission-based tags are introduced. Furthermore, the maximum reading range is theoretically calculated and practically verified considering the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Ultra Wideband (UWB) regulations. In all simulations and experiments conducted, a mono-static configuration is considered, in which one antenna is utilized for transmission and reception.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Frequency-Coded Chipless RFID Tags: Notch Model, Detection, Angular Orientation, and Coverage Measurements

Alam

Khaliel

Fawky

et al. 2020

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition to EPC, a Unique Identifier (UID) can be used [23], which consists of a 40-bit identifier hard-coded by the manufacturer to ensure it is really unique. This uniqueness property is being considered by the pharmaceutical industry, because it satisfies the requirements to offer an efficient, trustable and safely traceable solution.…”

Section: Ipv6 Mapping For Legacy Technologiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

IPv6 Addressing Proxy: Mapping Native Addressing from Legacy Technologies and Devices to the Internet of Things (IPv6)

Jara

Moreno-Sanchez

Skarmeta

et al. 2013

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sensors utilize a large number of heterogeneous technologies for a varied set of application environments. The sheer number of devices involved requires that this Internet be the Future Internet, with a core network based on IPv6 and a higher scalability in order to be able to address all the devices, sensors and things located around us. This capability to connect through IPv6 devices, sensors and things is what is defining the so-called Internet of Things (IoT). IPv6 provides addressing space to reach this ubiquitous set of sensors, but legacy technologies, such as X10, European Installation Bus (EIB), Controller Area Network (CAN) and radio frequency ID (RFID) from the industrial, home automation and logistic application areas, do not support the IPv6 protocol. For that reason, a technique must be devised to map the sensor and identification technologies to IPv6, thus allowing homogeneous access via IPv6 features in the context of the IoT. This paper proposes a mapping between the native addressing of each technology and an IPv6 address following a set of rules that are discussed and proposed in this work. Specifically, the paper presents a technology-dependent IPv6 addressing proxy, which maps each device to the different subnetworks built under the IPv6 prefix addresses provided by the internet service provider for each home, building or user. The IPv6 addressing proxy offers a common addressing environment based on IPv6 for all the devices, regardless of the device technology. Thereby, this offers a scalable and homogeneous solution to interact with devices that do not support IPv6 addressing. The IPv6 addressing proxy has been implemented in a multi-protocol card and evaluated successfully its performance, scalability and interoperability through a protocol built over IPv6.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, it allows a stronger electromagnetic field to be generated in response to an incoming RFID air protocol message and larger read distances can be achieved. More advanced active tags or sensor-tags may run additional software and can be equipped with communication software such as an IP protocol stack [9].…”

Section: Radio Frequency Identification (Rfid)mentioning

confidence: 99%