Webster's Propaganda and the Ashburton Treaty

Current, Richard N.

doi:10.2307/1896156

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Mexico (1 829-1 832)1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1991

2000

Publication Types

Select...

Article2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent2

Authors

Journals

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regardless of the source of the additional funds for the operation, its means were illegal and are therefore classified as controversial. Further, the operation's end of gaining Maine's acceptance for a negotiated settlement of the border was at odds with Tyler's strong states' rights pronouncements (Current 1947 ; Merk 1971). Therefore, the operation's ends are also classified as controversial.…”

Section: Mexico (1 829-1 832)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Interbranch Conflict and the Early Evolution of Covert Action as a Presidential Tool of Foreign Policy

Carter

2000

Southeastern Political Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A number of contemporary studies of executive-legislative relations have suggested that interbranch confict owes primarily to Ransient institutional factors such as the relative level of organizational development within the executive or the rise of individual over collective interests within Congress (Aberbach 1990;Dodd 1977). In keeping with this interbranch conflict paradigm Holt (1995) and Smist (1990) conclude that conflict over the control and oversight of covert operations is a phenomenon of the Cold War era which should be seen as a modern manfestation of these same institutional factors (See Holt 1995 2-3; Smist J990, 4-19).

show abstract

Section: Mexico (1 829-1 832)mentioning

confidence: 99%