2020
DOI: 10.3390/sym12091406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WebShell Attack Detection Based on a Deep Super Learner

Abstract: WebShell is a common network backdoor attack that is characterized by high concealment and great harm. However, conventional WebShell detection methods can no longer cope with complex and flexible variations of WebShell attacks. Therefore, this paper proposes a deep super learner for attack detection. First, the collected data are deduplicated to prevent the influence of duplicate data on the result. Second, to detect the results of the algorithm, static and dynamic feature are taken as the feature of the algo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
7
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the multi-layer perceptron method in reference [32], the accuracy of the method proposed in this study is improved by nearly 5%, the accuracy is improved by more than 6%, and the recall rate and F1 value are also greatly improved. Although the accuracy of the method in reference [33] is higher than that in this article, the accuracy of our method is improved by 0.45%, recall rate is improved by 2.87%, and F1 value is improved by 0.94%. For further analysis, we found the total number of WebShell samples in the dataset used in reference [33] is only 571, while the number of normal samples is 5379, the ratio is close to 1:10, the division ratio of training set and validation set is 7:3, and the number of WebShells in the verification set is only 172.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the multi-layer perceptron method in reference [32], the accuracy of the method proposed in this study is improved by nearly 5%, the accuracy is improved by more than 6%, and the recall rate and F1 value are also greatly improved. Although the accuracy of the method in reference [33] is higher than that in this article, the accuracy of our method is improved by 0.45%, recall rate is improved by 2.87%, and F1 value is improved by 0.94%. For further analysis, we found the total number of WebShell samples in the dataset used in reference [33] is only 571, while the number of normal samples is 5379, the ratio is close to 1:10, the division ratio of training set and validation set is 7:3, and the number of WebShells in the verification set is only 172.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysiscontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…By inputting the word vector obtained after preprocessing, the accuracy of the LSTM network and the GRU network both exceeded 98%, indicating that the extracted word vector as the original feature is feasible for WebShell detection. When using a GRU network, the algorithm's recall rate is 95.8%, which means that there will only 5 false We compared the methods proposed in references [4,6,32,33], and the performance indicators of each method are listed in Table 6.…”
Section: Experimental Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Webshell can be transformed into sequential text information by some means. Word2vec is a tool that can transform text information into word vectors and is used for webshell detection [34]. Tong [35] extracted word vectors from the native webshell using BERT.…”
Section: Methods Of Webshell Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%