1999
DOI: 10.1108/10662249910274601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Webmasters as mass media gatekeepers: a qualitative exploratory study

Abstract: Eight college and university Webmasters in three midwestern states were interviewed to explore their communications practices and activities by applying a traditional mass media gatekeeping perspective. The results suggest that gatekeeping theory is a valuable approach for studying individuals responsible for the mediation of messages in the emerging online media. Webmasters' personal characteristics and attitudes were found to influence their media content decisions, they share common values used to determine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, search engines are seen as wielding a great deal of power in what people know about a given topic-similar to how traditional news editors and journalists shape what audiences know about a given news topic. This directed flow of information-from an elite body to the public-is known as gatekeeping, and is traditionally applied to mass media contexts to understand the decision-making processes that drive news production in traditional broadcast and print media (Beard & Olsen 1999;Clayman & Reisner 1998;Shoemaker et al 2001;Schoemaker 1996;Whitney & Becker 1982;White 1950). In the context of online information, search engines are also seen to function like the news editor, allowing the search ranking algorithm to determine what content to display for a particular topic.…”
Section: The Case For Algorithm Transparencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For this reason, search engines are seen as wielding a great deal of power in what people know about a given topic-similar to how traditional news editors and journalists shape what audiences know about a given news topic. This directed flow of information-from an elite body to the public-is known as gatekeeping, and is traditionally applied to mass media contexts to understand the decision-making processes that drive news production in traditional broadcast and print media (Beard & Olsen 1999;Clayman & Reisner 1998;Shoemaker et al 2001;Schoemaker 1996;Whitney & Becker 1982;White 1950). In the context of online information, search engines are also seen to function like the news editor, allowing the search ranking algorithm to determine what content to display for a particular topic.…”
Section: The Case For Algorithm Transparencymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Internet and gatekeeping has also been a focus of scholars. Beard and Olsen (1999), interviewing academic webmasters, found that traditional gatekeeping theory still applied in the new media age. Meikle (2002) found that the Internet allowed those who are disempowered, in terms of political power, military power, or media ownership, to use the Internet to work around traditional gatekeepers in order to reach audiences.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fred Beard and Rolf L. Olsen's (1999) article, “Webmasters as mass media gatekeepers: a qualitative exploratory study”, does not deal directly with policy, but it is interesting as it posits that webmasters' personalities and attitudes influenced how they mediated messages as do other types of media gatekeepers, such as journalists. The authors cite a study of television stations that found that decision‐making seems to be a group process and that it was not always the same number of people involved (Beard and Olsen, 1999). In their study of eight university webmasters, they found that “several Webmasters said there were few institutional policies governing the content and appearance of their sites” (Beard and Olsen, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors cite a study of television stations that found that decision‐making seems to be a group process and that it was not always the same number of people involved (Beard and Olsen, 1999). In their study of eight university webmasters, they found that “several Webmasters said there were few institutional policies governing the content and appearance of their sites” (Beard and Olsen, 1999). However, they still seek participation and approval from committees, colleagues, supervisors and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%