Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

10
124
1
14

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
10
124
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…33% participants stated that the webinars are better than regular actual conferences and this was consistent with the 58.5%, 63.8% were the results of the participants for (GOOD answer) for improving clinical and surgical skills which implicit that they got benefi t from the online webinars during the period of pandemic and this is consistent with Christian Ebner and Andreas Gegenfurtner in their study " Learning and Satisfaction in Webinar, Online, and Face-to-Face Instruction": it was a Meta-Analysis study concluding that learning outcomes were better in webinars compared to faceto-face conferences [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…33% participants stated that the webinars are better than regular actual conferences and this was consistent with the 58.5%, 63.8% were the results of the participants for (GOOD answer) for improving clinical and surgical skills which implicit that they got benefi t from the online webinars during the period of pandemic and this is consistent with Christian Ebner and Andreas Gegenfurtner in their study " Learning and Satisfaction in Webinar, Online, and Face-to-Face Instruction": it was a Meta-Analysis study concluding that learning outcomes were better in webinars compared to faceto-face conferences [9].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…There has been enough growing interest in this tool among educators that a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of webinars was published by Gregenfurtner et al in 2019. 1 The meta-analysis yielded a few interesting results and affirmed existing beliefs on the positive impact of this educational tool on learners. Nonetheless, online learning cannot replace the benefits of attending medical conferences in person.…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…A contrast of webinars versus online synchronous learning and face-to-face instruction showed that webinars were net positive in terms of learner outcomes and marginally more effective in 15 independent contrasts summarizing between 500 and 700 participants (Gegenfurtner & Ebner, 2019…”
Section: Ta B L E 1 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We must further strive to maximize benefits not just in attendance but in learning and consolidation with positive, mediated social connections (Greenhow et al, 2019). The second key finding reported in a relevant meta-analysis was that webinars work (Gegenfurtner & Ebner, 2019).…”
Section: Ta B L E 1 (Continued)mentioning
confidence: 99%