2005
DOI: 10.1109/te.2005.858390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WeBAL: A Web-Based Assessment Library to Enhance Teaching and Learning in Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, a rubric should be designed or selected accordingly [30], [31]. Moreover, multiple specific and single point in time rubrics can be used in conjunction with a single general and developmental over time rubric.…”
Section: ) Plan Assessment and Evaluation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, a rubric should be designed or selected accordingly [30], [31]. Moreover, multiple specific and single point in time rubrics can be used in conjunction with a single general and developmental over time rubric.…”
Section: ) Plan Assessment and Evaluation Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electronic systems should offer a complete approach, covering the actual marking process in addition to management aspects (Jones et al 2005). Electronic systems can positively influence links between assessment and teaching and learning (Buzzetto-More and Alade 2006) and can increase the awareness of staff regarding assessment approaches (Aller et al 2005). Electronic systems can contribute to staff development by facilitating sharing of marking comments among colleagues (McKenzie 2004).…”
Section: Additional Aspects Around Electronic Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many automated assessment systems, MCQ formats are common and assessment libraries or question data banks are frequently used (Aller et al 2005;Quellmalz and Haertel 2004). Forced-choice (or MCQ) questions have been criticized for: (1) their ineffective assessment of skills, competencies and depth of knowledge; (2) the difficulty in drawing a fine line between acceptable and available choices; and (3) the assumption that instructors can produce effective and error-free MCQ in their subject area which can result in students using strategies involving guess work, risk taking and the memorization of anticipated questions (Dudley 1973;Premadasa 1993).…”
Section: Common Mcq Format and Assessment Scopementioning
confidence: 99%