2011
DOI: 10.5539/cis.v4n3p138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Services Selection Based on Mixed Context and Quality of Service Ontology

Abstract: Intensive efforts are made in the Web services selection literature by these days mainly because of the overwhelming interest of the community in the services provided over the Web. In selecting best services, the non functional properties of such services are proven to be more and more important; these describe the Quality of service that is the key factor in the selection process.In this paper, we discuss a Web service selection based on both the context and the QoS ontology. We propose an architecture that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A new model for web service selection (Keskesl et al, 2010), based on a mixed context and QoS ontology. The authors particularly show how this approach can be made to support an e-commerce framework and how it can add dynamics to B2B interactions by automating selection among heterogeneous services.…”
Section: Web Services Selection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A new model for web service selection (Keskesl et al, 2010), based on a mixed context and QoS ontology. The authors particularly show how this approach can be made to support an e-commerce framework and how it can add dynamics to B2B interactions by automating selection among heterogeneous services.…”
Section: Web Services Selection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach based on QoS and user profile, it uses all QoS parameter. Ran (2003) The certifier The problem is verify claims with to determine the web service providers matching algorithm Yu and Lin (2007) The performance Defeat and and the effective complexity for of approach large problems Khutade and Phalnikar (2012) The simplicity The matching of this approach algorithm is unable to take a correct decision D' Mello et al (2008) The effective of Only some QoS this approach parameters are considered Alrifai et al (2009) The results This approach is optimality based on a very limited set of architectural requirements Kyriakos and Plexousakis (2007) The functional Only some QoS and non-functional parameters are requirements are used considered Fauvet et al (2007) The dynamicity The rules of this approach definition by the providers is not automatic Berdjouh and Kazar (2009) The performance The approach of the matching based on agent is algorithm not secure Guo et al (2011) The optimality Only some of the matching QoS parameters algorithm are considered Zhang (2014) The optimality The difficulty and the rapidity to choose the of this algorithm optimisation parameters of the swarm algorithm Sachan et al (2014) The efficient Only some QoS of the web parameters are service selection considered Murugesan et al (2014) The optimality The approach of this approach based on agent is not secure Keskesl et al (2010) The consistency This approach and the effectiveness is not precise of this approach Wang et al (2006) The precision This approach and the simplicity does not take of this algorithm into account the users' opinion 3 Web service selection approach based on QoS and user profile Our architecture of web service selection based on QoS and user profile is shown in Figure 1, involves two services. The selection-service allows to select the domain and the QoS request by users.…”
Section: Web Services Selection Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Keskes et al (2010) proposed a model that makes an automatic selection of best service provider that is based on mixed context and QoS ontology for a given set of parameters of QoS. It approach provides interesting benefits for QoS enhancement, allows a well interoperability between heterogeneous services, but disagree in the automatic service selection using multi-dimensional QoS and did not address any issue related to service integration in the limited portable devices.…”
Section: Jsit 151mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yu et al [7] present a broker-based architecture to facilitate the selection of QoS-based services. Recent approaches of service selection are deeply involved in semantic manner using ontology which draw the attention of many researchers [8] [9] [10] [11] [12].…”
Section: Numeric Based Qos Matchmakingmentioning
confidence: 99%