IFIP/IEEE Eighth International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, 2003.
DOI: 10.1109/inm.2003.1194191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Services Management Network: an overlay network for federated service management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interoperability of the web service gateway with web service management frameworks as described by Dan et al [2] and Machiraju et al [8] will be further studied. Also the inclusion of the other two transormation (directory facilitator-UDDI and agent description-WSDL) is future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The interoperability of the web service gateway with web service management frameworks as described by Dan et al [2] and Machiraju et al [8] will be further studied. Also the inclusion of the other two transormation (directory facilitator-UDDI and agent description-WSDL) is future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dan et al [2] present a framework for differentiated levels of service through automated management and SLAs. Machiraju et al [8] introduce an architecture for federated service management, which targets management of web services that interact across administrative domains (and involves multiple stakeholders).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of services as applications that can be accessed over the Internet through a software interface is used in this paper as in [4]. The concept of Service Overlay Networks (SON) is not new as well.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, QoE can be expressed as the user perception of end-to-end QoS [3]. Putting the basis for evaluating QoE of services is a first class issue, as it would allow coping quite straightforwardly with other relevant issues such as (i) the definition of service level agreements [27,16] based on the actual quality of service perceived by users, (ii) the clear and unambiguous assignment of responsibilities for enforcing each quality parameter value (and to possibly define the corresponding penalties in case of unsatisfactory levels) [24,14], and (ii) the definition of integrated architectures among service, network, and device providers, cooperating to enforce QoE parameters [19,15].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%