2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2010.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web services discovery and rank: An information retrieval approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Originally, only low-level information on the operations of the web resources (such as the basic interface details like method names, types and parameters) was available, or non-functional criteria such as response time or usage data (Birukou et al, 2007); Al-Masri and Mahmoud, 2007). The development of registries based on standards such as UDDI allowed the addition of metadata-based techniques (Dong et al, 2004;Chukmol, 2008;Crasso et al, 2008), initially based on traditional keyword search but eventually considering more advanced IR techniques (Plebani and Pernici, 2009) and, in line with the priorities of our work, a more user-oriented view (Rong and Liu, 2010), explicitly based on requirements (Hao and Zhang, 2007;Hao et al, 2010;Nazir et al, 2008). (Skoutas et al, 2010) also bases the discovery of web services on the requirements and, ranks and clusters the relevant services with objective measures based on dominance relationships among them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Originally, only low-level information on the operations of the web resources (such as the basic interface details like method names, types and parameters) was available, or non-functional criteria such as response time or usage data (Birukou et al, 2007); Al-Masri and Mahmoud, 2007). The development of registries based on standards such as UDDI allowed the addition of metadata-based techniques (Dong et al, 2004;Chukmol, 2008;Crasso et al, 2008), initially based on traditional keyword search but eventually considering more advanced IR techniques (Plebani and Pernici, 2009) and, in line with the priorities of our work, a more user-oriented view (Rong and Liu, 2010), explicitly based on requirements (Hao and Zhang, 2007;Hao et al, 2010;Nazir et al, 2008). (Skoutas et al, 2010) also bases the discovery of web services on the requirements and, ranks and clusters the relevant services with objective measures based on dominance relationships among them.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Relying on such parameter names most likely leads to incorrect matching. Hao et al [16] use the TF-IDF score to compute the similarity between Web service clusters. They propose two indexing structures of TF-IDF vectors to provide relevancy score and ranking of the output results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xu et al [51] and Wang et al [52] used semantic matching technology to analyse service description files, and then ranked services in the candidate set according to their semantic distance from the user's request. A schema tree matching algorithm was proposed by Hao et al [53] to rank web services automatically. In [54], a service network is first constructed by analysing descriptions of the Web services from Web pages or WSDL files, then the PageRank algorithm is used to rank the related services with respect to a specified query topic.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%