2015
DOI: 10.6109/jkiice.2015.19.9.2064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web Service Performance Improvement with the Redis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Van et al compared the read/write performance of sensor data between Cassandra and MongoDB, and concluded that Cassandra is a good choice for relatively larger amounts of sensor data, while MongoDB is good for smaller amounts of sensor data [16]. Kim et al utilized Redis to solve the high traffics of web services in concurrent access [17]. Although these NoSQL DBMS offer the benefits of high-performance writing/querying for large volume real-time input data, a novel approach for organization of real-time geospatial data is needed to cope with both fast-growing real-time input data and on-the-fly analysis results for real-time geo-processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van et al compared the read/write performance of sensor data between Cassandra and MongoDB, and concluded that Cassandra is a good choice for relatively larger amounts of sensor data, while MongoDB is good for smaller amounts of sensor data [16]. Kim et al utilized Redis to solve the high traffics of web services in concurrent access [17]. Although these NoSQL DBMS offer the benefits of high-performance writing/querying for large volume real-time input data, a novel approach for organization of real-time geospatial data is needed to cope with both fast-growing real-time input data and on-the-fly analysis results for real-time geo-processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%