Web-Based Design Coordination

Domeshek, Eric A.; Holman, E. Riley

doi:10.1115/detc2002/cie-34404

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At last, the model-based approach claims the design rationale should be contained the domain specific knowledge such as functions, behavior of artefacts and design principles. Advanced Design Coordination Tools (ADCT), developed by Domeshek and holman (2002), is the on-line web-based environment based on this approach (Domeshek and Holman, 2002).…”

Section: Design Rationale In the Field Of Knowledge Management For Engineering Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Design Rationale Analysis Method Towards Robust Artifact Design

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To design a more robust artifact, an artifact design based on a design rationale analysis is pivotal. Errors in previous design rationales that led to the degradation of artifact robustness in the past provide valuable knowledge towards improving the robust design. However, methods for exposing and analysing errors in design rationale remain unclear. This paper proposes a structured method for a design rationale analysis based on logical structuring. This method provides a well-constructed means of identifying and analysing errors in design rationale from the perspective of knowledge operation.

show abstract

Section: Design Rationale In the Field Of Knowledge Management For Engineering Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Design Rationale Analysis Method Towards Robust Artifact Design

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Under the past research progress, Garcia and Howard (1992) classifies various attempts into three categories; model-based rationale, argumentation-based rationale, and action-based rationale. ADCT (Domeshek and Holman, 2002) is a web-based cooperative design support environments on modelbased design rationale representation. Systems based on this approach have a conceptual model of the product, which consists of various background information of design, i.e., customer's values, functions, structure, standards, regulations and physical first-principals.…”

Section: Problem Of Design Rationale Acquisition 21 Three Categoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design Rationale Acquisition in Conceptual Design by Hierarchical Integration of Action, Model and Argumentation

Nomaguchi

Ohnuma

Fujita

2004

Volume 4: 24th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper proposes a framework for acquiring design rationale in the conceptual design. Knowledge management is getting much attention for supporting the early phases of design process. While the research outcomes on design rationale might be useful in the direction, their capabilities are still far from practice. Such outcomes are categorized into model-based, argumentation-based and action-based frameworks. These are complementary when knowledge acquisition facility and explanatory power is considered. This paper introduces the hierarchical model of design rationale for overcoming the shortcomings of individual approaches under three frameworks. It consists of argument level, model operation level and action level. Argument level represents a designer’s decision making process. Model operation level represents a sequence of design operations. A design operation follows and is followed by a design stage, which records a design snapshot over conceptual product model. Action level represents design process as a sequence of operation primitives, which are elementary and atomic operations on the product model. These linkages of three levels enable to automatically acquire design rationale through operation primitives over a design support system.

show abstract

A context analysis method for empathy in co-creative innovation

Tsutsui

Mitake

Hosono

et al. 2021

JAMDSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In industrialised countries, the competitiveness of the products/services of the manufacturing industries in the global market is declining due to many factors, including commoditisation, rapid technological growth in developing countries and a lack of creativity within manufacturing companies. For this reason, designers in industrialised countries are required to create more innovative products/services whose novelty does not depend on their own original technology alone but on flexible resource integration among diverse actors. In order to design innovative products/services, empathy must be developed among diverse actors around the premise of the design. However, the ways to understand rationalities of each other is still unclear in extant research. As a result, diverse actors with heterogeneous rationalities fail to empathise to others, and designing innovative products/services as intended is difficult. To address this issue, this study aims to develop a practical method that achieve to understand the rationality of other actor in design innovative products/services. To achieve this, a context analysis method is proposed that captures the other actor's context in formalised procedure. The proposed method includes four steps: conducting an interview to extract information of context, modelling the context, understanding the context and carrying out the depth interview to understand a target actor's rationality completely based on the context modelling result. The proposed method was applied to therapy robot development, which is in its early stage of innovative service design. Moreover, the application result can encourage an actor to understand the other actor's rationality by utilising the proposed method.

show abstract

Web-Based Design Coordination

Cited by 4 publications

References 3 publications

A Design Rationale Analysis Method Towards Robust Artifact Design

A Design Rationale Analysis Method Towards Robust Artifact Design

Design Rationale Acquisition in Conceptual Design by Hierarchical Integration of Action, Model and Argumentation

A context analysis method for empathy in co-creative innovation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About