Proceedings of the International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2207016.2207047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Web accessibility and people with dyslexia

Abstract: Although the dyslexia has significant occurrence in the global population, ranging from 15 to 20%, not much is known about how developers, designers, and content producers should respect differences and consider people with dyslexia in the Web. In this paper we present a survey regarding the state of the art on dyslexia and Web Accessibility. From the results, we present a set of 41 guidelines that may support website stakeholders (i.e., people directly involved with the design, development, and content) in ph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Policy and law in Sweden, as in the rest of the European Union [2], points to WCAG, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines as the standard to comply with requirements of accessibility [33]. Even though WCAG has been important for the development of web accessibility, it has also has been criticized for lack of support to people with cognitive impairments [34,35], intellectual disabilities [36], dyslexia [37] in favour of people with sensory and physical impairments [25].…”
Section: Accessibility and Universal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Policy and law in Sweden, as in the rest of the European Union [2], points to WCAG, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines as the standard to comply with requirements of accessibility [33]. Even though WCAG has been important for the development of web accessibility, it has also has been criticized for lack of support to people with cognitive impairments [34,35], intellectual disabilities [36], dyslexia [37] in favour of people with sensory and physical impairments [25].…”
Section: Accessibility and Universal Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Decoding errors are common among dyslexic users (Snowling, 2000) which has led to suggestions that dyslexics focus more on images than words (Houts et al, 2006;de Santana et al, 2012). However, icons are suggested to demand more neurological effort than word processing in general (Huang et al, 2015), which may undermine H 3 .…”
Section: Icons Vs Wordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the awareness about cognitive accessibility has been increasing in the last few years, it is still less than necessary comparing to the current awareness related to visual or hearing disability, for example. In one hand, researches on human-computer interaction in Brazil have advanced on the development of resources and guidelines about specific cognitive disabilities, such as Autism (Britto & Pizzolato, 2018;Melo, Santos, Rivero, & Barreto, 2017) and Dyslexia (Cascaes et al, 2018;de Santana, de Oliveira, Almeida, & Baranauskas, 2012). On the other hand, professionals involved in the web development industry lack fundamental knowledge about how to design inclusive solutions for people with cognitive disabilities, as we evidenced in the results of the survey.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%