The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weathering the storm? The impact of trauma on romantic relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
38
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
38
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If both partners suffer from PTSD, then the mutual understanding and empathy might be increased, but “a mutual impact of the partners’ individual symptoms on one another” may persist (p. 60) ( Nelson et al, 2002 ). The recently published Dyadic Responses to Trauma Model illustrates different ways in which a traumatic event can impact on the couple relationship ( Marshall and Kuijer, 2017 ). It provides a possible framework to explain why some partners can be resilient or at risk for individual psychological reactions to trauma but also to relationship outcomes, and also depicts how these processes unfold dyadically ( Marshall and Kuijer, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If both partners suffer from PTSD, then the mutual understanding and empathy might be increased, but “a mutual impact of the partners’ individual symptoms on one another” may persist (p. 60) ( Nelson et al, 2002 ). The recently published Dyadic Responses to Trauma Model illustrates different ways in which a traumatic event can impact on the couple relationship ( Marshall and Kuijer, 2017 ). It provides a possible framework to explain why some partners can be resilient or at risk for individual psychological reactions to trauma but also to relationship outcomes, and also depicts how these processes unfold dyadically ( Marshall and Kuijer, 2017 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recently published Dyadic Responses to Trauma Model illustrates different ways in which a traumatic event can impact on the couple relationship ( Marshall and Kuijer, 2017 ). It provides a possible framework to explain why some partners can be resilient or at risk for individual psychological reactions to trauma but also to relationship outcomes, and also depicts how these processes unfold dyadically ( Marshall and Kuijer, 2017 ). It underlines previous findings that PTSD symptoms of each member of a couple were independently related to distress in their relationship ( Riggs, 2014 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monson, Fredman, and Dekel (2010) proposed the Cognitive Behavioral Interpersonal (CBI) model, which also asserts bidirectional associations among individual and couple-level factors and focuses primarily on cognitions, behaviors, and emotions. Most recently, Marshall and Kuijer (2017) proposed the Dyadic Responses to Trauma (DRT) model, which hypothesizes that event interpretation and coping styles lead to specific psychological responses that, in turn, impact relationship processes. Each of these models captures the importance of considering both partners and proposes a set of specific individual and couple-level factors as key mechanisms of action.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study conducted in China during the COVID-19 pandemic showed that emotional well-being in married people was lower than in unmarried people (49). Evidence suggests that stressful or life-threatening events, such as natural disasters, can lead to a decline in the quality of relationships due to stress and con ict or, instead, improve the quality of relationships and intimacy (50)(51)(52). Also, during the COVID-19 con nement, several factors can lead to increased tension between romantic partners con ned together, such as disturbed everyday activities, the fear of the pandemic, loss of physical activity, loss of outside social networks, lack of access to non-essential health services, and reduced physical interaction in overcrowded households (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%