2018
DOI: 10.1111/ibi.12598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weather conditions and date influence male Sage Grouse attendance rates at leks

Abstract: For lek-breeding birds, lek attendance can be correlated with mating success. Variability in lek attendance could confound interpretation of male reproductive effort and complicate the use of lek counts as an index to monitor abundance. We assessed the daily probability of male Sage Grouse Centrocercus urophasianus lek attendance and explored implications of attendance on lek counts. We fitted 145 males with global positioning system (GPS) transmitters over 4 years in Carbon County, Wyoming. We evaluated influ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Longer-term surveys using acoustic methods could provide an alternative data source where lek counts are not possible, or potentially allow calibration between lek counts undertaken at different sites on different days (Sadoti et al 2016). This would help to address variation in lek attendance through the season (Sadoti et al 2016;Fremgen et al 2018). In addition, bioacoustics offers a non-intrusive survey method in comparison to other techniques such as lek counts, GPS/ radio tagging and use of dogs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Longer-term surveys using acoustic methods could provide an alternative data source where lek counts are not possible, or potentially allow calibration between lek counts undertaken at different sites on different days (Sadoti et al 2016). This would help to address variation in lek attendance through the season (Sadoti et al 2016;Fremgen et al 2018). In addition, bioacoustics offers a non-intrusive survey method in comparison to other techniques such as lek counts, GPS/ radio tagging and use of dogs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this does not appear to be true over shorter time frames, due to the considerable daily variation in call activity. This variation is likely the result of factors such as the date within the lekking season, and weather conditions affecting bird behaviour-factors that could also affect lek counts, and which are perhaps not considered fully within that method at the current time (Raynor et al 2017;Fremgen et al 2018). In addition, the mobility of Capercaillie around the lek site, with birds potentially displaying from different places on different mornings, may affect their detectability on a day-to-day basis, and adverse weather conditions (i.e.…”
Section: Capercaillie Call Activity Is Related To Lek Count Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all of these reasons, lek counts have been widely used by resource agencies to monitor trends in sage-grouse populations across long terms and large scales (Walsh et al 2004, Connelly et al 2011, McCaffery et al 2016, and their potential for tracking population response to local-scale management may be high. There is a growing body of literature examining various aspects of lek counting methodology, including assessments of both field, e.g., male sightability, and sampling, e.g., repeated vs single count, considerations (Fedy and Aldridge 2011, Monroe et al 2016, Baumgardt et al 2017, Wann et al 2019 as well as the frequency of male lek attendance and its relevance to availability for detection (e.g., Blomberg et al 2013, Fremgen et al 2019, Wann et al 2019. However, these studies largely addressed sampling questions relevant to large-scale monitoring, such as statewide or subregions within a state, and there is comparably little research addressing sampling concerns surrounding local population monitoring at the relatively small scale of individual habitat treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two components relate to the distribution and movement of individuals, including probability that a bird's home range overlaps the sampling unit (p s ; in the case of sage-grouse, attending a lek at least once in a season) and probability of presence at the sampling unit during the count (p p ). The other two components characterize the detection process for birds given their presence at the sampling unit: probability of being available for (Beck and Braun 1980, Emmons and Braun 1984, Walsh et al 2004, Fremgen et al 2019, Wann et al 2019. As a result, trends in sage-grouse populations are typically estimated using the maximum observed number of males from repeated counts each year at each lek (hereafter, peak counts; Connelly et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%