2017
DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearing Many (Social) Hats: How Different Are Your Different Social Network Personae?

Abstract: This paper investigates when users create profiles in different social networks, whether they are redundant expressions of the same persona, or they are adapted to each platform. Using the personal webpages of 116,998 users on About.me, we identify and extract matched user profiles on several major social networks including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram. We find evidence for distinct site-specific norms, such as differences in the language used in the text of the profile self-description, and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…demonstrate the implications for cross-platform prediction. customize user bios to suit particular social media platforms (Zhong et al 2017) in order to be socially desirable (Edwards 1957), as well as the need to associate -for instance, self-identify as the member of a certain age group or community (Papacharissi 2002). We hypothesize that the influence of self-categorization and social desirability would be observed in the individual choices to post certain messages on Facebook versus Twitter, and the relationship of user traits with honest vs. positive self-presentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…demonstrate the implications for cross-platform prediction. customize user bios to suit particular social media platforms (Zhong et al 2017) in order to be socially desirable (Edwards 1957), as well as the need to associate -for instance, self-identify as the member of a certain age group or community (Papacharissi 2002). We hypothesize that the influence of self-categorization and social desirability would be observed in the individual choices to post certain messages on Facebook versus Twitter, and the relationship of user traits with honest vs. positive self-presentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings also reiterate previous research on language use in mental health (De Choudhury et al 2013). An important insight from our work was that the predictive utility of different platforms varies, as has been seen in prior research looking at differences in self-disclosure (Jaidka et al 2018;Zhong et al 2017). This motivates the need for transfer learning when the stress model trained on Facebook language needs to be applied to Twitter language.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Then, we evaluate how models trained on Facebook perform at predicting stress from Twitter language in a crossdomain setting. Previous studies showed that predictive performance changes in cross-domain applications (Jaidka et al 2018;Zhong et al 2017). Therefore, we then attempt to Facebook Twitter User Engagement (Lin et al 2014) .11 .05 TensiStrength (Thelwall 2017) .17…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-disclosure is also influenced by the type of content found on differing social media platforms. These observations are relevant to note in netnography as it may provide an explanation as to why self-disclosure in the online communities, and the "personalities" that come with it, can vary across different social media platforms [32]. As different platforms, and their respective content, are used by individuals of varying demographics, it is often observed that individuals' self-disclosure behaviors will be based on the level of risk and reward that a specific platform may bring them [32].…”
Section: Self-disclosurementioning
confidence: 94%