2017
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.04791
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearing Many (Social) Hats: How Different are Your Different Social Network Personae?

Abstract: This paper investigates when users create profiles in different social networks, whether they are redundant expressions of the same persona, or they are adapted to each platform. Using the personal webpages of 116,998 users on About.me, we identify and extract matched user profiles on several major social networks including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram. We find evidence for distinct site-specific norms, such as differences in the language used in the text of the profile self-description, and the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely due to the fact that Twitter and Facebook have differences in language, both in terms of vocabulary (e.g. emoticons) and subject matter use (Jaidka et al 2018;Zhong et al 2017;Guntuku et al 2019). Importantly, these highly significant correlations (p < .01) nevertheless demonstrate that the Facebook prediction models encode significant mental health information that can be used to estimate the mental health status of Twitter users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely due to the fact that Twitter and Facebook have differences in language, both in terms of vocabulary (e.g. emoticons) and subject matter use (Jaidka et al 2018;Zhong et al 2017;Guntuku et al 2019). Importantly, these highly significant correlations (p < .01) nevertheless demonstrate that the Facebook prediction models encode significant mental health information that can be used to estimate the mental health status of Twitter users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%