2007 6th International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ipsn.2007.4379727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Wireless Sensor Network to Assess Clinical Status in Patients with Neurological Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O'Donovan et al (2009) reported favorable comparison between gait analysis measured using SHIMMER kinematic sensors and gold standard optical (Codamotion) measurement. The SHIMMER (Barton & Jung, 2009;Lorincz et al, 2007;Patel et al, 2007) sensors are controlled by and communicate data to a master PC via a Bluetooth radio stack. The application software was developed using the BioMOBIUS (2009) software environment that supports data capture at rates up to 100Hz for kinematic SHIMMERs and up to 500Hz for ECG SHIMMERs.…”
Section: Figure 2 Overview Of the Tril Gait Analysis Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O'Donovan et al (2009) reported favorable comparison between gait analysis measured using SHIMMER kinematic sensors and gold standard optical (Codamotion) measurement. The SHIMMER (Barton & Jung, 2009;Lorincz et al, 2007;Patel et al, 2007) sensors are controlled by and communicate data to a master PC via a Bluetooth radio stack. The application software was developed using the BioMOBIUS (2009) software environment that supports data capture at rates up to 100Hz for kinematic SHIMMERs and up to 500Hz for ECG SHIMMERs.…”
Section: Figure 2 Overview Of the Tril Gait Analysis Platformmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensors became an essential device to collect the data from a physical world. Electronic sensing systems have been utilized in a variety of applications, including biomedical observation, civil engineering monitoring, and energy resource detection [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Size of the sensors have reduced to fit into a greater number of applications, and they employ batteries to power themselves without external power connection for easier placement [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While many other new mote platforms have been developed since then (e.g., Iris [4], Epic [6], Shimmer [9], and BTNode [2]) most of these platforms are still based on similar MCUs as the one used on the TelosB described above. Some platforms including the iMote2 [5] provided developers with higher computational power (processing speed up to 416MHz with 256KB of RAM for the iMote2) at the expense of reduced energy efficiency and therefore could not be used in applications that require long-term and unattended deployments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%