2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39399-5_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Technology in Hospitals: Overcoming Patient Concerns About Privacy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Technology privacy is broadly defined as the extent to which users control, transfer, and exchange their own personal information (Shin, 2010), in addition to having an awareness about the unwelcome disclosure of personal information to unknown or prohibited entities (Sergueeva and Shaw, 2016). In the context of housekeeper wearables, it may be viewed as a privacy risk if employees possess concerns regarding supervisor or co-worker access to their personal information, physiological status, location, or have more general anxieties concerning data security and encryption (Choi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Personal Privacy Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technology privacy is broadly defined as the extent to which users control, transfer, and exchange their own personal information (Shin, 2010), in addition to having an awareness about the unwelcome disclosure of personal information to unknown or prohibited entities (Sergueeva and Shaw, 2016). In the context of housekeeper wearables, it may be viewed as a privacy risk if employees possess concerns regarding supervisor or co-worker access to their personal information, physiological status, location, or have more general anxieties concerning data security and encryption (Choi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Personal Privacy Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, effective and well organized management of personal information must be reinforced in order to protect privacy and security of users. Medical and financial information collected from individuals is considered to be more sensitive than information about their demographics and shopping preferences (Sergueeva & Shaw, 2016;Sheehan & Hoy, 2000).…”
Section: Privacy -Personalization Paradoxmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, smart sensors (e.g., Fitbit [22]) monitor users and provide clinicians with the required information about the user. Nevertheless, these technologies may infringe upon the user’s privacy since they might provide their details and activity to third parties, making users reluctant to utilise them [23]. Moreover, there are key strategic problems directly related to the rehabilitation quality, such as the management of resources, knowledge and big data, which are still unresolved.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%