2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable-sensor-based pre-impact fall detection system with a hierarchical classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on whether the user’s interference is necessary, current fall detection methods can be classified into two categories: user-dependent and user-independent. The user-dependent methods either use wearable devices (e.g., pendant, watch, clip, bracelet, or ring) to track rapid changes in its orientation or rely on users themselves to report the emergency of fall by interacting (e.g., pressing) the wearable device [4,5,6,7,8,9]. These options suffer from limitations such as getting the person to wear the device or false-positive detection (e.g., a fall is incorrectly identified when no fall occurs) due to user’s abrupt movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on whether the user’s interference is necessary, current fall detection methods can be classified into two categories: user-dependent and user-independent. The user-dependent methods either use wearable devices (e.g., pendant, watch, clip, bracelet, or ring) to track rapid changes in its orientation or rely on users themselves to report the emergency of fall by interacting (e.g., pressing) the wearable device [4,5,6,7,8,9]. These options suffer from limitations such as getting the person to wear the device or false-positive detection (e.g., a fall is incorrectly identified when no fall occurs) due to user’s abrupt movement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multiphase fall model divides a fall process into several fall phases. Various types of fall models have been proposed for the analysis of fall events [ 17 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. There are two common types of fall models.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They employed the SVM, KNN, and random forest (RF) for fall event identification and the fall associated activity recognition using a series of experiments data. Another solution is described in [26] concerning the prior detection of fall using angles and angular‐velocity measurement gathered by two wearable sensors placed in the human waist and thigh. In this work, the performances of the hierarchical Fisher's discriminant analysis classifier are investigated when identifying non‐fall, backward fall, and forward fall to avoid false alarms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%