2020
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2971907
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Sensor Array Design for Spine Posture Monitoring During Exercise Incorporating Biofeedback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this problem, technological research has increasingly moved toward the development of soft, highly flexible, bendable sensors. Several soft sensors have been proposed for monitoring different joint angles, but only a few have been proposed specifically for the back area [ 21 , 22 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. However, none of these are intended to detect CTMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To address this problem, technological research has increasingly moved toward the development of soft, highly flexible, bendable sensors. Several soft sensors have been proposed for monitoring different joint angles, but only a few have been proposed specifically for the back area [ 21 , 22 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. However, none of these are intended to detect CTMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, only a few studies have documented their use for spinal monitoring purposes. In [ 21 ], Caviedes et al proposed a flexible triangular sensor array to monitor the spine posture and, thus, the correctness of task execution in postural rehabilitation therapies. However, the system did not allow for the detecting of CTMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 Preliminary reports on ergonomically optimized standing mats have suggested that they are capable of reducing subjective back pain and pain-related behaviors, such as weight shifting between feet, during surgery. 39,40 Posture-correcting devices [41][42][43] and clothing 44 have garnered equivocal results at best, but there remains a paucity of well-designed independent studies exploring their effect in surgeons specifically.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensor weight is approximately 3 g. Its response time is less than 10 ms, its recovery time is less than 15 ms, and the operating temperature range is from −20 wearable sensors that can be integrated in different platforms such as chairs or clothes. Many embedded systems based on this concept have been reported in literature, but research activity is still ongoing and aims at lowering the systems' cost and increasing accuracy and users' comfort [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. A systematic review with respect to wearables for assessing spine kinematics and kinetics is available in [21].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%