2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21030682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Sensing Devices: Towards the Development of a Personalized System for Construction Safety and Health Risk Mitigation

Abstract: Wearable sensing devices (WSDs) are increasingly helping workers stay safe and healthy in several industries. However, workers, especially in the construction industry, have shown some aversion towards the use of WSDs due to their ability to capture specific information that may be considered personal and private. However, this revered information may provide some critical insight needed by management to plan and optimize worksite safety and support technology adoption in decision making. Therefore, there is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of wearable technology in sports is driven by the need to understand biomechanics to prevent injury and to provide immediate feedback to athletes and coaches, which is a common interest for both. Although the benefits of wearable sensors systems (e.g., shock impact assessment) have significant potential for health risk mitigation in the occupational health domain, their ability to capture specific information that may be considered personal and private by the worker may hinder its utilization [ 67 ]. Hence, the potential conflict of interest by employers and workers may possibly explain the lack of research in this area as well as the lack of papers on shock impacts in the occupational domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of wearable technology in sports is driven by the need to understand biomechanics to prevent injury and to provide immediate feedback to athletes and coaches, which is a common interest for both. Although the benefits of wearable sensors systems (e.g., shock impact assessment) have significant potential for health risk mitigation in the occupational health domain, their ability to capture specific information that may be considered personal and private by the worker may hinder its utilization [ 67 ]. Hence, the potential conflict of interest by employers and workers may possibly explain the lack of research in this area as well as the lack of papers on shock impacts in the occupational domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The perceived performance of a sensor to increase safety in the workplace is a strong predictor of worker acceptance 105 . Sensors that can detect workers’ proximity to workplace hazards like energized electrical hazards, toxic gases, and fire/smoke are viewed as critical safety functions having mutual value to both workers and management 106 …”
Section: Newer Sensors and The Workermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplace acceptance is also linked to concerns about the use of data collected by wearable sensors by the employer, but sometimes for unexpected reasons. In a recent survey, construction workers rated environmental sensor functions as having greater impact on worker safety and health than wearable sensors sampling physiological outputs but were more open to sharing physiological data than environmental data 106 . This was so because physiological sensors do not track a worker's location as environmental sensors do 106 …”
Section: Newer Sensors and The Workermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[9]. However, one of the aspects that has recently attracted most interest in the scientific community and that represents a great challenge is related to safety [10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%