2021
DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2021.3110202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Real-Time Haptic Biofeedback Foot Progression Angle Gait Modification to Assess Short-Term Retention and Cognitive Demand

Abstract: Foot progression angle gait (FPA) modification is an important part of rehabilitation for a variety of neuromuscular and musculoskeletal diseases. While wearable haptic biofeedback could enable FPA gait modification for more widespread use than traditional tethered, laboratory-based approaches, retention, and cognitive demand in FPA gait modification via wearable haptic biofeedback are currently unknown and may be important to reallife implementation. Thus, the purpose of this study was to assess the feasibili… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the participant population was limited to young adults to study the immediate effects of rhythmic feedback on arm swing and gait, while avoiding confounding factors such as the effects of aging on participants' performance. Recent limited results of using tactile haptic in improving the arm swing amplitude of a stroke patient [32] and the stride-time variability of PD patients [33] show promise and results from the literature support the use of haptic feedback given that synchronizing and reacting to such cues happen unconsciously [43] or without significantly increasing the user's cognitive load [49]. However, due to the different proprioceptive, cognitive, and physical abilities of older adults and other clinical populations, which may hinder sensing tactile feedback or adjusting gait accordingly, the immediate and long-term effects of the presented feedback system remain to be investigated in those populations.…”
Section: H Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the participant population was limited to young adults to study the immediate effects of rhythmic feedback on arm swing and gait, while avoiding confounding factors such as the effects of aging on participants' performance. Recent limited results of using tactile haptic in improving the arm swing amplitude of a stroke patient [32] and the stride-time variability of PD patients [33] show promise and results from the literature support the use of haptic feedback given that synchronizing and reacting to such cues happen unconsciously [43] or without significantly increasing the user's cognitive load [49]. However, due to the different proprioceptive, cognitive, and physical abilities of older adults and other clinical populations, which may hinder sensing tactile feedback or adjusting gait accordingly, the immediate and long-term effects of the presented feedback system remain to be investigated in those populations.…”
Section: H Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…recurrent neural networks (RNN), heuristics, thresholds, support vector machine (SVM), reduced support vector machine (RSVM), finite state machine (FSM) algorithms. Real-time haptic biofeedback devices are implemented to correct toe-in or toe-out during walking, using foot progression angle gait algorithm [29]. Real-time algorithms, such as convolutional long short-term memory neural network (CLSTM-NN), heuristic and fast complementary filter (FCF) algorithms are widely studied for classification of gait terrain and walking modes, such as overground walking, stair ascend or descend and others [30], [31], [32].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%