Wearable Health Devices in Health Care: Narrative Systematic Review

Abstract

Background With the rise of mobile medicine, the development of new technologies such as smart sensing, and the popularization of personalized health concepts, the field of smart wearable devices has developed rapidly in recent years. Among them, medical wearable devices have become one of the most promising fields. These intelligent devices not only assist people in pursuing a healthier lifestyle but also provide a constant stream of health care data for disease diagnosis and treatment by actively recording physiological parameters and tracking metabolic status. Therefore, wearable medical devices have the potential to become a mainstay of the future mobile medical market. Objective Although previous reviews have discussed consumer trends in wearable electronics and the application of wearable technology in recreational and sporting activities, data on broad clinical usefulness are lacking. We aimed to review the current application of wearable devices in health care while highlighting shortcomings for further research. In addition to daily health and safety monitoring, the focus of our work was mainly on the use of wearable devices in clinical practice. Methods We conducted a narrative review of the use of wearable devices in health care settings by searching papers in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library published since October 2015. Potentially relevant papers were then compared to determine their relevance and reviewed independently for inclusion. Results A total of 82 relevant papers drawn from 960 papers on the subject of wearable devices in health care settings were qualitatively analyzed, and the information was synthesized. Our review shows that the wearable medical devices developed so far have been designed for use on all parts of the human body, including the head, limbs, and torso. These devices can be classified into 4 application areas: (1) health and safety monitoring, (2) chronic disease management, (3) disease diagnosis and treatment, and (4) rehabilitation. However, the wearable medical device industry currently faces several important limitations that prevent further use of wearable technology in medical practice, such as difficulties in achieving user-friendly solutions, security and privacy concerns, the lack of industry standards, and various technical bottlenecks. Conclusions We predict that with the development of science and technology and the popularization of personalized health concepts, wearable devices will play a greater role in the field of health care and become better integrated into people’s daily lives. However, more research is needed to explore further applications of wearable devices in the medical field. We hope that this review can provide a useful reference for the development of wearable medical devices.

Experiences of Young People and Their Caregivers of Using Technology to Manage Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Literature Review and Narrative Synthesis

“…Owing to the integrative narrative character of our review, we did not conduct a meta-analysis or report statistical results. This is in line with the narrative synthesis method used in previous systematic reviews [34][35][36]. We used the quality assessment of the respective studies/papers (MMAT) to ensure credibility of the papers.…”

A conceptual IoT-based early-warning architecture for remote monitoring of COVID-19 patients in wards and at home

“…Moreover, the monitoring of vital signs allows the extraction of detailed information from patients’ health status [25] . These data, in turn, can be used to monitor changes in symptoms during treatment [26] , detect risk conditions early [27] , and trigger alarms in case of a worsening in the patient's health conditions [28] . Thus, the IoT-HMS aims to act as an intelligent preventive tool that detects and acts on sudden changes in health status [29] .…”

Telerehabilitation for Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Program Evaluation

“…Additional future directions include examining the efficacy of a hybrid rehabilitation model, validating remote functional assessments, ensuring that the development and delivery of a telerehabilitation model is grounded in health behavior change theories [25], further exploring patient perceptions of home-based exercise monitoring [26,27]; integrating automatic download of Bluetooth exercise equipment, serial oximetry, and activity trackers into a virtual clinical care platform [28,29]; and customizing remote monitoring to meet the unique needs of a heterogeneous LTx population. The use of telerehabilitation and remote monitoring to support physical activity beyond the early posttransplant period may mitigate the well-documented risks of developing or worsening cardiometabolic disease following LTx.…”