2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41746-022-00593-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable fitness tracker use in federally qualified health center patients: strategies to improve the health of all of us using digital health devices

Abstract: As the use of connected devices rises, an understanding of how digital health technologies can be used for equitable healthcare across diverse communities is needed. We surveyed 1007 adult patients at six Federally Qualified Health Centers regarding wearable fitness trackers. Findings indicate the majority interest in having fitness trackers. Barriers included cost and lack of information, revealing that broad digital health device adoption requires education, investment, and high-touch methods.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there are significant racial disparities in terms of access to wearable devices. A study from 2022 showed that wearable devices, along with other digital technologies, are not as widely used in low-income and minority populations 16 . The study highlights cost and education as significant factors affecting access and use of wearables.…”
Section: Consumer Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, there are significant racial disparities in terms of access to wearable devices. A study from 2022 showed that wearable devices, along with other digital technologies, are not as widely used in low-income and minority populations 16 . The study highlights cost and education as significant factors affecting access and use of wearables.…”
Section: Consumer Wearablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ownership was similar between participants of different ethnic backgrounds, but Black and Hispanic individuals were less likely to approve sharing of their data for heart disease research. On the other hand, surveys performed in Federally Qualified Health Centers with predominantly underrepresented population (70% nonwhite, 70% learning less than 30,000) report lower wearable ownership of 21% [ 27 ]. Cost was the main barriers for those who did not own a fitness tracker but would like to own one.…”
Section: Barriers To Digital Health Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later there were other works [35,36,37] that explored SWs for health purposes. On the broader scale some [38,39] analyze datasets of heart rate variability and some analysis physical activity [40,41,42]. However, they were analyzed independently, and no study has been done to identify the correlation between the two approaches.…”
Section: Analysis Of Heart Ratementioning
confidence: 99%