2023
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2022-0160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wearable Device Validity in Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate Across Age, Gender, and Body Mass Index: Data Analysis From a Systematic Review

Abstract: Background: This paper examined whether the criterion validity of step count (SC), energy expenditure (EE), and heart rate (HR) varied across studies depending on the average age, body mass index (BMI), and predominant gender of participants. Methods: Data from 1536 studies examining the validity of various wearable devices were used. Separate multilevel regression models examined the associations among age, gender, and BMI with device criterion validity assessed using mean absolute percent error (MAPE) at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were provided with a Fitbit Versa 4 device. Fitbit devices provide acceptably accurate measures of MVPA ( 34–37 ). Providing participants with a Fitbit device homogenized the tracking of physical activity compared with providing other wearable devices (e.g., Apple Watch) or using smartphone applications (e.g., Health by iOS), which would not have been standardized across all operating systems (e.g., Google's Android and Apple's iOS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were provided with a Fitbit Versa 4 device. Fitbit devices provide acceptably accurate measures of MVPA ( 34–37 ). Providing participants with a Fitbit device homogenized the tracking of physical activity compared with providing other wearable devices (e.g., Apple Watch) or using smartphone applications (e.g., Health by iOS), which would not have been standardized across all operating systems (e.g., Google's Android and Apple's iOS).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, sex could be inputted into the AW settings, and we found a significantly better estimated EE for male participants. Preliminary evidence [32] indicates that algorithms for wearable devices are developed mostly based on reference data from male participants and may therefore be less accurate for female participants. The AW's underestimation of EE increased with intensity, which contradicts findings from previous AW studies [24,33].…”
Section: Ee Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%