The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15071296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear-Time Compliance with a Dual-Accelerometer System for Capturing 24-h Behavioural Profiles in Children and Adults

Abstract: To advance the field of time-use epidemiology, a tool capable of monitoring 24 h movement behaviours including sleep, physical activity, and sedentary behaviour is needed. This study explores compliance with a novel dual-accelerometer system for capturing 24 h movement patterns in two free-living samples of children and adults. A total of 103 children aged 8 years and 83 adults aged 20-60 years were recruited. Using a combination of medical dressing and purpose-built foam pouches, participants were fitted with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
45
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(39 reference statements)
5
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of those who provided verbal consent and availability to wear the accelerometer, 95.2% (533/560), 90.9% (358/394), 95.4% (248/260), and 97.6% provided compliant data at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Our compliance rates for accelerometry were similar to large-scale prospective cohort studies in older women with single time point measurements [ 36 ] and were above the 71.6% wear time compliance estimates from adults wearing thigh and back-placed accelerometers [ 39 ] and much higher than estimates of 62.6% among children who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [ 40 ]. Compliant data on distance-delivered methodologies are sparse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Of those who provided verbal consent and availability to wear the accelerometer, 95.2% (533/560), 90.9% (358/394), 95.4% (248/260), and 97.6% provided compliant data at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Our compliance rates for accelerometry were similar to large-scale prospective cohort studies in older women with single time point measurements [ 36 ] and were above the 71.6% wear time compliance estimates from adults wearing thigh and back-placed accelerometers [ 39 ] and much higher than estimates of 62.6% among children who participated in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey [ 40 ]. Compliant data on distance-delivered methodologies are sparse.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…(The current paper presents data from a larger study.) At the very end of the lab session, an accelerometer sensor was applied on the anterior left thigh [29, 30] and worn for all hours during 1 week, before it was returned by mail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Movement intensity can also be estimated as being sedentary, or being of a light, moderate or vigorous nature. The protocol for accelerometer wear (dual placement) and data processing has been validated by previous studies (Duncan et al, 2018;Schneller et al, 2017;Stewart et al, 2018).…”
Section: Objective Assessment Of Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%