2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wear study of structured coated belts in advanced abrasive belt finishing

Abstract: Advanced belt finishing process is remarkably simple and inexpensive. The principle of operation is simple: pressure-locked shoes platens circumferentially press an abrasive coated belt on a rotating workpiece. This abrasive machining process reduces significantly surface irregularities subsequently improving geometrical quality and increasing wear resistance and fatigue life. It is therefore extensively used in automotive industry to superfinish crankshaft journals. However, the major industrial issue about t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diamond abrasive grains have a grit size of D 76. valleys in cross-grid pattern and flat areas or plateaus without profile peaks [6][7][8][9]. The tool and the process parameters, causing different material removal mechanisms, influence the resulting surface characteristics roughness and bearing area ratio [6,7,10,11]. When considering previous models the material removal mechanisms in microfinishing processes can be assumed as an interaction of the tribological wear mechanisms microcracking, microfatigue, and the mechanisms microridging, microploughing, and microcutting in analogy to longitudinal stroke honing processes [5,[12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The diamond abrasive grains have a grit size of D 76. valleys in cross-grid pattern and flat areas or plateaus without profile peaks [6][7][8][9]. The tool and the process parameters, causing different material removal mechanisms, influence the resulting surface characteristics roughness and bearing area ratio [6,7,10,11]. When considering previous models the material removal mechanisms in microfinishing processes can be assumed as an interaction of the tribological wear mechanisms microcracking, microfatigue, and the mechanisms microridging, microploughing, and microcutting in analogy to longitudinal stroke honing processes [5,[12][13][14][15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These investigations are focused on the possibilities for surface structuring by means of microfinishing, in order to obtain basic knowledge about the interactions of the parameters using defined abrasive belts. Other studies regarding defined abrasive belts focus on tool wear and address belts with pyramidal agglomerates [10,16].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several grinding materials that can be utilized as abrasives, however, the two most commonly used grain types found in sandpaper consist of aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) or silicon carbide (SiC) [6][7][8]. Variations in the material morphology and the surface structure will have a large impact on the performance and the wear dynamics of the abrasive, which has also previously been demonstrated [8,9]. Results from these published studies suggest that for example the grain size of the abrasives has a large effect on the wear rate, with a diminished wear rate below a certain particle diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, these surfaces have a high bearing area ratio. The material removal mechanisms that influence the roughness and bearing surface ratio are determined by the tool specifications, process parameters, and workpiece properties [2,7,27,28]. The material removal mechanisms in microfinishing processes can be assumed as an interaction of mechanisms like microcracking and microfatigue, and mechanisms of microridging, microploughing, and microcutting, analogous to longitudinal stroke honing processes [26,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%