“…As the low pressure cylinders were of identical size, and on the assumption that the transmission path to the receiving sensors are identical, it was observed that the strongest AE source was from 'LP2 Rear', and as such, it is highly probable that rubbing of mating surfaces at this position was at a particular stage of wear that resulted in higher AE activity than at 'LP1 Rear'. The relationship between AE levels and wear has been investigated for sliding of lubricated and dry mating surfaces [18,19,20,21,22,27]. Acoustic Emission activity was shown to be dependent on the asperity contact, surface roughness and third body interactions.…”